Difference between revisions of "2010-03-01 TSC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
back to [[TSC Minutes and Agendas]] | back to [[TSC Minutes and Agendas]] | ||
| − | + | [[category:2010 TSC Minutes]] | |
==TSC Minutes - see template original at [[Meeting Minutes template]]== | ==TSC Minutes - see template original at [[Meeting Minutes template]]== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|width="25%"|'''Email Address''' | |width="25%"|'''Email Address''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD||cbeebe@mayo.edu |
|- | |- | ||
|x||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD||woody@beelers.com | |x||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD||woody@beelers.com | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|x||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate||Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net | |x||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate||Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate||rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |||John Quinn||HL7 CTO||jquinn@hl7.org |
|- | |- | ||
|x||Gregg Seppala||HL7 SSD SD Alternate||gregg.seppala@va.gov | |x||Gregg Seppala||HL7 SSD SD Alternate||gregg.seppala@va.gov | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | |||
#Visitors: none | #Visitors: none | ||
#Agenda accepted | #Agenda accepted | ||
| − | #Unanimous Approval of minutes by general consent | + | #Unanimous Approval of minutes by general consent<br/>Minutes of 1/17 corrections unanimously approved. |
#Three-year plan: missing reference to SAIF or EA IP on three year plan. Lynn is looking for high-level planning descriptions under which specific tasks can be grouped. Helen feels the ArB activities in general should be included on the three year plan. Charlie McCay notes that the ArB has a mission and charter we’ve approved for them so we don’t need to plan for them, just as each of the Work Groups that are authorized under the Steering Divisions are not part of our plan. Lynn notes the T3F Strategic Initiative called for a review of the TSC after two years, perhaps under the TSC Continuous Improvement Plan. Further suggestions and comments by email for next week’s draft review to approve prior to the WGM. Discussion ensued on the process by which projects become subject to ArB review, prior to or following Steering Division approval. Austin wants clear guidelines on what he needs to do when he gets a new project… | #Three-year plan: missing reference to SAIF or EA IP on three year plan. Lynn is looking for high-level planning descriptions under which specific tasks can be grouped. Helen feels the ArB activities in general should be included on the three year plan. Charlie McCay notes that the ArB has a mission and charter we’ve approved for them so we don’t need to plan for them, just as each of the Work Groups that are authorized under the Steering Divisions are not part of our plan. Lynn notes the T3F Strategic Initiative called for a review of the TSC after two years, perhaps under the TSC Continuous Improvement Plan. Further suggestions and comments by email for next week’s draft review to approve prior to the WGM. Discussion ensued on the process by which projects become subject to ArB review, prior to or following Steering Division approval. Austin wants clear guidelines on what he needs to do when he gets a new project… | ||
#CEO Report - none | #CEO Report - none | ||
#CTO Report: not available | #CTO Report: not available | ||
# ArB: Charlie Mead notes the Security Ontology project was studied by the ArB last week with feedback to the Steering Division, supporting the concept of what they’re doing but had concerns with scope and approach and Cecil will work with the project team directly on the details. Technical newsletter ArB article to be done by end of day. Mead noted that the Security ontology was discussed last week at Steering Division, and was approved to move forward. This occurred prior to the Thursday ArB meeting. It’s on the agenda for next week for the TSC. The updated project scope statement would have to be recirculated to the cochairs for a week prior to the TSC review. | # ArB: Charlie Mead notes the Security Ontology project was studied by the ArB last week with feedback to the Steering Division, supporting the concept of what they’re doing but had concerns with scope and approach and Cecil will work with the project team directly on the details. Technical newsletter ArB article to be done by end of day. Mead noted that the Security ontology was discussed last week at Steering Division, and was approved to move forward. This occurred prior to the Thursday ArB meeting. It’s on the agenda for next week for the TSC. The updated project scope statement would have to be recirculated to the cochairs for a week prior to the TSC review. | ||
| − | #* | + | #*'''Action Item: '''Lynn will check on having all the TSC members on all the Steering Division lists to see when potential areas of conflict arise. |
| − | #DESD: SPL R5; Helen had questions on the multiple ballot types, and the identity of the pharmaceutical and device companies intended to implement the DSTU. There are many involved. Helen asks also to mark strategic initiative item C in addition to A. It is also providing B to improve and streamline CPM. Unanimously approved with friendly amendment. | + | #DESD: SPL R5; Helen had questions on the multiple ballot types, and the identity of the pharmaceutical and device companies intended to implement the DSTU. There are many involved. Helen asks also to mark strategic initiative item C in addition to A. It is also providing B to improve and streamline CPM. |
| − | # | + | #*'''Motion:''' Approve project scope with strategic intiative C included. |
| − | # | + | #*'''Vote:'''Unanimously approved with friendly amendment. |
| − | + | # FTSD: Batch messaging ; security ontology proposal and micro ITS coming up; batch messaging on the agenda for 3/8. | |
| − | # | + | #SSD SD: Gregg has no report |
| − | # | + | #T3SD: Helen has no report |
| − | -- | + | #WGM planning - Review Three year plan. Helen would like to address PIC first time attendees process, questionnaire to cochairs after Kyoto. Time to start getting Brazilian visas! Do we acknowledge we’re attending a conference or not? Tourist application includes attending a conference but not if you have compensation (speaker honoraria). Need to get the information to the education committee. Lynn will give an update next week on what’s been learned by HQ. |
| + | #Discussion topics: information piece: V3 vital record DAM ballot was requested to waive participation fee for non members. | ||
| + | #ORC Liaison: Scott Robertson has been name d a cochair for ORC. They’ve had a meeting. Approved an agreement renewal with WEDI. Evaluating agreement with Continua. Discussion on releasing Continua confidential information to the Wiki, what is the HL7 responsibility. HL7 OMG renewal had minor changes, membership swap; other issues as well, not yet approved. Formalizing HSSP collaboration was one issue, and sharing IP another. Chuck Jaffe to review. Mohawk has not yet been addressed but is in the plans. Global harmonization task force (GHTF) seeking an agreement, forwarded to Chuck. Meeting again in two weeks. Another review on an item that was deemed a joint project, not suitable for MOU and not requiring ORC unless directed by TSC to review. Looking also at some strategic things, but currently in catch-up mode to review high-priority agreements going forward. Lynn will schedule an ORC standing update every other week after their meetings. | ||
| + | #SMART objectives #4. | ||
| + | #*Rename all SAEAF to SAIF | ||
| + | #*Helen asks why we’re doing this when the Roadmap committee / task force is reviewing our input. Charlie McCay asks if there is anything in particular we want to pull out and discuss. They are not specific plans or proposals for the TSC, just conceptual. He asks to put it into the top of the document. Rename SAEAF to SAIF or note that it has been changed at the top. Set the context at top of document, as result of brainstorming by TSC, put forward for consideration and discussion, as of xyz date. '''Action Item:'''Lynn will do so. | ||
| + | #*What is next step, asks Ravi? TSC should review what the Roadmap committee produces for specific tasks. | ||
| + | #Adjourned 12:01 pm. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 4 June 2010
back to TSC Minutes and Agendas
TSC Minutes - see template original at Meeting Minutes template
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466# |
Date: 2010-03-01 Monday Time: 11:00 am-12:00 pm Eastern Time | ||
| Facilitator | Charlie McCay | Note taker(s) | Lynn Laakso |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | Email Address |
| Calvin Beebe | HL7 SSD SD | cbeebe@mayo.edu | |
| x | Woody Beeler | HL7 FTSD | woody@beelers.com |
| ? | Marc Koehn | invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM | marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com |
| x | Austin Kreisler | HL7 DESD | austin.j.kreisler@saic.com |
| x | Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting) | HL7 HQ | lynn@hl7.org |
| regrets | Ken McCaslin | HL7 TSS SD | Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com |
| x | Charlie McCay (chair) | HL7 TSC Chair | charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk |
| x | Charlie Mead | HL7 ArB | Charlie.mead@booz.com |
| x | Ravi Natarajan | HL7 Affiliate | Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net |
| Ron Parker | HL7 ArB Alternate | rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca | |
| John Quinn | HL7 CTO | jquinn@hl7.org | |
| x | Gregg Seppala | HL7 SSD SD Alternate | gregg.seppala@va.gov |
| x | Helen Stevens | HL7 TSS SD Alternate | helen.stevens@shaw.ca |
| x | Ed Tripp | HL7 DESD Alternate | Edward.tripp@estripp.com |
| x | D. Mead Walker | HL7 FTSD Alternate | dmead@comcast.net |
| . | |||
| Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: yes | |||
Agenda Topics
| |||
| Supporting Documents | |||
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
| |||
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
| |||
