Difference between revisions of "2015-07-27 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
<!-- #WGM Planning - --> | <!-- #WGM Planning - --> | ||
#[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=313 Open Issues List] | #[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=313 Open Issues List] | ||
+ | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
*Last week’s minutes accepted via general consent. | *Last week’s minutes accepted via general consent. | ||
Line 111: | Line 112: | ||
**'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | **'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | ||
*Freida notes that there is discussion going on about the new USR-SC not being a traditional international affiliate. TSC will not weigh in at the current time, but will comment at a later time if it becomes warranted. | *Freida notes that there is discussion going on about the new USR-SC not being a traditional international affiliate. TSC will not weigh in at the current time, but will comment at a later time if it becomes warranted. | ||
− | *Terminology QA Project Scope Statement: Paul has concern that there is an aspect of governance activity coming together in this project. T3SD noted that a new peer review process is being created outside of existing peer review process. Paul states they may not know that the process exists. ACTION: Paul will take this back to the WG to have them review the existing peer review process to determine if it will work for their purposes. Also have them review the “introducing new processes” document. | + | *Terminology QA Project Scope Statement: Paul has concern that there is an aspect of governance activity coming together in this project. T3SD noted that a new peer review process is being created outside of existing peer review process. Paul states they may not know that the process exists. |
+ | **'''ACTION:''' Paul will take this back to the WG to have them review the existing peer review process to determine if it will work for their purposes. Also have them review the “introducing new processes” document. | ||
**'''MOTION''' to conditionally approve project contingent upon review of those documents; Paul seconds. | **'''MOTION''' to conditionally approve project contingent upon review of those documents; Paul seconds. | ||
**'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | **'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | ||
− | *CDS Knowledge Artifact Specification DSTU Update 3: Paul states that they did do a limited review. .**ACTION: put TSC guidance documents on agenda for October co-chair dinner on Monday (Freida). As far as this document, it appears they fell within the existing rules. | + | *CDS Knowledge Artifact Specification DSTU Update 3: Paul states that they did do a limited review. . |
+ | **'''ACTION:''' put TSC guidance documents on agenda for October co-chair dinner on Monday (Freida). As far as this document, it appears they fell within the existing rules. | ||
**'''MOTION:''' Anne to invite project representative to discuss on next call to discuss why limited review was sufficient given nature of the change. | **'''MOTION:''' Anne to invite project representative to discuss on next call to discuss why limited review was sufficient given nature of the change. | ||
**'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | **'''VOTE:''' All in favor. | ||
Line 136: | Line 139: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
− | * . | + | *Paul will take Terminology QA scope statmenet back to the WG to have them review the existing peer review process to determine if it will work for their purposes. Also have them review the “introducing new processes” document |
+ | *Anne to add TSC Guidance Documents on agenda for October co-chair dinner on Monday for Freida to present | ||
+ | *Anne to add announcement in update from the TSC that peer review of revised publication request template will begin August 3rd | ||
+ | *Anne to add "publishing process for white papers" to 8/3 agenda | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> |
Latest revision as of 20:48, 30 July 2015
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2015-07-27 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer |
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
x | Ken McCaslin | x | Tony Julian | x | Jean Duteau | . | |
Regrets | John Quinn | x | Lorraine Constable | x | Giorgio Cangioli | . | |
Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
x | Melva Peters | Regrets | Woody Beeler | . | Calvin Beebe | x | Freida Hall |
x | John Roberts | x | Paul Knapp | . | Pat van Dyke | x | Andy Stechishin |
. | x | Russ Hamm | . | . | |||
ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote | . | . | obs1 | x | Anne Wizauer | |
. | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | . | . | obs2 | . |
|
. | . | . | . | . | |||
Agenda
Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2015-07-20 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- Approval of GOM revisions
- Discussion topics:
- Review of Revised Publication Request Template. Project Services adapted the Publication Request Template to include the Interopability Speification Matrix (ISM) - Freida
- Does the GOM imply that there is no need to take a vote to publish/submit a request to publish?
Management
- Review action items –
- Paul to take issues back to FTSD on Project Approval Request by the SOA WG of FTSD for Privacy, Access and Security Services Access Control Conceptual Model at Project Insight 200 and TSC Tracker 8405.
- Referred by T3SD due to lack of Publishing facilitator
- Referred by DESD due to 1) no implementers, 2)September 2015 ballot cycle is an external driver? 3) no ballot reconciliation listed nor time for a second ballot
- Paul to take issues back to FTSD on Project Approval Request by the SOA WG of FTSD for Privacy, Access and Security Services Access Control Conceptual Model at Project Insight 200 and TSC Tracker 8405.
- Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
- Project Approval Request by the Clinical Decision Support WG of SSD SD for CDS Knowledge Artifact Specification DSTU Update 3 at Project Insight 931 and TSC Tracker 5631.
- Referred by T3SD: Lineage says this is a . release replacing a prior version, but they did not include any type of review in the schedule (per TSC’s DSTU Update vs. DSTU Reballot Guidance) “ This project will create a Release 1.3. It is an update to an existing DSTU. It supplants a previous release.” Needs to have formal review for . release or ballot for full release.
- Project Approval Request by the Vocabulary WG of FTSD for Terminology Quality Development and Management Processes at Project Insight 1196 and TSC Tracker 8451
- Referred by T3SD: re: 3.g. Project Objectives / Deliverables / Target Dates to Develop Peer Review process – This group should be following TSC approved: Introducing New Processes to HL7 which describes several methods to conduct Peer Review (already defined), especially since they intend to define a new process; also provides guidance on rollout.
- Project Approval Request by the Clinical Decision Support WG of SSD SD for CDS Knowledge Artifact Specification DSTU Update 3 at Project Insight 931 and TSC Tracker 5631.
- Approval items from last week approved 0/0/0:
- DSTU Publication Request of HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: Clinical Quality Language (CQL)-based Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF), Release 1 at Project Insight 1142 and TSC Tracker 8443
- Approval items for this week's e-vote:
- Project Approval Request by the CQI WG of DESD of CQF-based HQMF Implementation Guide at Project Insight 1142 and TSC Tracker 5612
- TSC sent to ArB for clarification regarding product family issue; ArB resolved issues and it is back to TSC for formal approval.
- Project Approval Request by the CQI WG of DESD of CQF-based HQMF Implementation Guide at Project Insight 1142 and TSC Tracker 5612
- Discussion topics:
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- Open Issues List
Minutes
- Last week’s minutes accepted via general consent.
- GOM changes:
- MOTION: Freida moves that the TSC approves the updates to the GOM. John Roberts seconds.
- VOTE: All in favor.
- Freida notes that there is discussion going on about the new USR-SC not being a traditional international affiliate. TSC will not weigh in at the current time, but will comment at a later time if it becomes warranted.
- Terminology QA Project Scope Statement: Paul has concern that there is an aspect of governance activity coming together in this project. T3SD noted that a new peer review process is being created outside of existing peer review process. Paul states they may not know that the process exists.
- ACTION: Paul will take this back to the WG to have them review the existing peer review process to determine if it will work for their purposes. Also have them review the “introducing new processes” document.
- MOTION to conditionally approve project contingent upon review of those documents; Paul seconds.
- VOTE: All in favor.
- CDS Knowledge Artifact Specification DSTU Update 3: Paul states that they did do a limited review. .
- ACTION: put TSC guidance documents on agenda for October co-chair dinner on Monday (Freida). As far as this document, it appears they fell within the existing rules.
- MOTION: Anne to invite project representative to discuss on next call to discuss why limited review was sufficient given nature of the change.
- VOTE: All in favor.
- CQF-based HQMF IG: ArB engaged vocab for advice and issue was resolved.
- MOTION to approve the project by Tony; second by Andy.
- VOTE: All in favor
- Revised publication request template: Freida reviews changes to document. Added link to interoperability specification matrix at the end of the document.
- MOTION to send out for peer review from TSC; second by Tony.
- VOTE: All in favor
- ACTION: Anne to announce in update that the document will be open starting August 3rd for peer review through August 24.
- Discussion on white papers – we don’t really have a place on the publication request for white papers; should we add a parenthetical on our current request after informative document?
- ACTION: Anne to add “publishing process for white papers” on 8/2 agenda (Freida, John R.)
- Privacy, Access, and Security Services Access Control Conceptual Model:
- MOTION to approve with updates to implementers and schedule; on second by John Roberts.
- VOTE: all in favor
- Will start looking at ballot list/naming convention next week. On 8/24 or 8/31 we will make a motion to submit to GOC for January cycle.
- Call adjourned at 11:59 a.m. Eastern
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.