Difference between revisions of "2015-07-13 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
− | *Paul – addition to agenda for discussion next week: Use of SNOMED codes as mandatory in FHIR; larger discussion of using licensed codes across organization. Lorraine clarifies topic as using required or preferred value sets (appropriate usage of licensed code systems across HL7). Freida: HTA explored use of external vocabularies. Russ: HTA is aware of it and they are mandated to coordinate interaction with external terminology providers. Will monitor discussion over this week | + | *Paul – addition to agenda for discussion next week: Use of SNOMED codes as mandatory in FHIR; larger discussion of using licensed codes across organization. Lorraine clarifies topic as using required or preferred value sets (appropriate usage of licensed code systems across HL7). Freida: HTA explored use of external vocabularies. Russ: HTA is aware of it and they are mandated to coordinate interaction with external terminology providers. Will monitor discussion over this week. '''ACTION: Anne to add to agenda for next Monday.''' |
− | *MOTION by Andy to approve minutes of last week; Melva seconds. VOTE: all in favor | + | *'''MOTION''' by Andy to approve minutes of last week; Melva seconds. |
− | *GOM revisions out for peer review: Karen sent out a packet of the items up for review on 7/8; comments due 8/7. Freida went through each change; no comments by the group. Encouraged further review and if comments, bring them back to the group. | + | *'''VOTE:''' all in favor |
− | *Publishing risk assessment by ArB. ArB created some slides which Tony reviewed. Lorraine would add that we have a pattern of challenges that occur because we approach each of these problems individually without considering larger organization. Tony: comment came in about viability of SAIF and its real-world value. If you’re not applying SAIF principles, you’re not developing across enterprise. Lorraine: we also note that lots of projects have been initiated to deal with individual points of publishing risks; but they’re not being effective at moving forward because they’re not coordinated across the organization. John Q: how should the TSC proceed? Tony: it has to go to the EC – the issue is only getting worse. Not enough volunteers to do this properly. The Board needs to apply some money to the project to figure out the mitigation strategies. Melva: at TRAC, Brian Pech and Andy presented on publishing risks. Lorraine: this is ArB’s response to that content. Mario: Can the TSC add gravity to the level of risk that this represents? Paul: it would be valuable if the TSC added their comment to this before passing it on. Anne to add to next week’s call for further discussion. MOTION by Paul to table this discussion to next Monday and provide it to TSC members for review. Second by Melva. VOTE: all in favor. | + | *GOM revisions out for peer review: Karen sent out a packet of the items up for review on 7/8; comments due 8/7. Freida went through each change; no comments by the group. Encouraged further review and if comments, bring them back to the group. '''ACTION: Anne will add to 7/27 call for approval.''' |
− | *Project approval request referred for discussion – EMS Hospital Outcomes Report: Melva reports the co-sponsor lines were simply missed. EC WG was a late add; Melva will get dates. She will send a note back asking them to explain how much content has been externally developed and to clean up the contradictory wording. Question regarding referencing UB-04 as a vocabulary (it is a form) – Freida mentions there are codes tied to the forms. Melva will ask them to clarify which vocabularies are being used from UB-04. Anne to add update on the document to next Monday’s call. | + | *Publishing risk assessment by ArB. ArB created some slides which Tony reviewed. Lorraine would add that we have a pattern of challenges that occur because we approach each of these problems individually without considering larger organization. Tony: comment came in about viability of SAIF and its real-world value. If you’re not applying SAIF principles, you’re not developing across enterprise. Lorraine: we also note that lots of projects have been initiated to deal with individual points of publishing risks; but they’re not being effective at moving forward because they’re not coordinated across the organization. John Q: how should the TSC proceed? Tony: it has to go to the EC – the issue is only getting worse. Not enough volunteers to do this properly. The Board needs to apply some money to the project to figure out the mitigation strategies. Melva: at TRAC, Brian Pech and Andy presented on publishing risks. Lorraine: this is ArB’s response to that content. Mario: Can the TSC add gravity to the level of risk that this represents? Paul: it would be valuable if the TSC added their comment to this before passing it on. '''ACTION: Anne to add to next week’s call for further discussion.''' |
− | * MOTION to adjourn by Paul, second by Melva. VOTE: all in favor. Call adjourned at 11:55 AM Eastern time | + | **'''MOTION''' by Paul to table this discussion to next Monday and provide it to TSC members for review. Second by Melva. |
− | + | **'''VOTE:''' all in favor. | |
− | + | *Project approval request referred for discussion – EMS Hospital Outcomes Report: Melva reports the co-sponsor lines were simply missed. EC WG was a late add; Melva will get dates. She will send a note back asking them to explain how much content has been externally developed and to clean up the contradictory wording. Question regarding referencing UB-04 as a vocabulary (it is a form) – Freida mentions there are codes tied to the forms. Melva will ask them to clarify which vocabularies are being used from UB-04. '''ACTION: Anne to add update on the document to next Monday’s call.''' | |
+ | *'''MOTION''' to adjourn by Paul, second by Melva. | ||
+ | *'''VOTE:''' all in favor. Call adjourned at 11:55 AM Eastern time | ||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
Line 114: | Line 116: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
− | * | + | *Melva to take back issues surrounding EMS Hospital Outcomes Report to WG for resolution |
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> |
Latest revision as of 21:22, 16 July 2015
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2015-07-13 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer |
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
Regrets | Ken McCaslin | x | Tony Julian | . | Jean Duteau | . | |
x | John Quinn | x | Lorraine Constable | x | Giorgio Cangioli | . | |
Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
x | Melva Peters | Regrets | Woody Beeler | . | Calvin Beebe | x | Freida Hall |
x | John Roberts | x | Paul Knapp | . | Pat van Dyke | x | Andy Stechishin |
. | x | Russ Hamm | . | . | |||
ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote | . | x | Mario (Aegis) | x | Anne Wizauer | |
. | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | . | . | obs2 | . |
|
. | . | . | . | . | |||
Agenda
Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2015-07-06 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- Discussion topics:
- GOM revisions out for peer review (Freida - 20 Minutes)
- Product issues ARB/TRAC working together (Tony - 10 minutes)
- Looking at the Kaiser slides
Management
- Review action items –
- Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
- Project Approval Request by the CIC WG of DESD for EMS Hospital Outcomes Report at Project Insight 1186 and TSC Tracker 8380 (30 minutes)
- Referred by T3SD re: lack of recorded co-sponsor approval and explanation of co-sponsor level of involvement;
- Referred by ArB for contradictory information regarding amount of externally developed content;
- Referred by SSD-SD for mentioning the use of UB04 as a vocabulary.
- Project Approval Request by the CIC WG of DESD for EMS Hospital Outcomes Report at Project Insight 1186 and TSC Tracker 8380 (30 minutes)
- Approval items for this week:
- Project Approval Request by teh SOA WG of FTSD for Privacy, Access and Security Services Access Control Conceptual Model at Project Insight 200 and TSC Tracker 8405
- Discussion topics:
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- Open Issues List
Minutes
- Paul – addition to agenda for discussion next week: Use of SNOMED codes as mandatory in FHIR; larger discussion of using licensed codes across organization. Lorraine clarifies topic as using required or preferred value sets (appropriate usage of licensed code systems across HL7). Freida: HTA explored use of external vocabularies. Russ: HTA is aware of it and they are mandated to coordinate interaction with external terminology providers. Will monitor discussion over this week. ACTION: Anne to add to agenda for next Monday.
- MOTION by Andy to approve minutes of last week; Melva seconds.
- VOTE: all in favor
- GOM revisions out for peer review: Karen sent out a packet of the items up for review on 7/8; comments due 8/7. Freida went through each change; no comments by the group. Encouraged further review and if comments, bring them back to the group. ACTION: Anne will add to 7/27 call for approval.
- Publishing risk assessment by ArB. ArB created some slides which Tony reviewed. Lorraine would add that we have a pattern of challenges that occur because we approach each of these problems individually without considering larger organization. Tony: comment came in about viability of SAIF and its real-world value. If you’re not applying SAIF principles, you’re not developing across enterprise. Lorraine: we also note that lots of projects have been initiated to deal with individual points of publishing risks; but they’re not being effective at moving forward because they’re not coordinated across the organization. John Q: how should the TSC proceed? Tony: it has to go to the EC – the issue is only getting worse. Not enough volunteers to do this properly. The Board needs to apply some money to the project to figure out the mitigation strategies. Melva: at TRAC, Brian Pech and Andy presented on publishing risks. Lorraine: this is ArB’s response to that content. Mario: Can the TSC add gravity to the level of risk that this represents? Paul: it would be valuable if the TSC added their comment to this before passing it on. ACTION: Anne to add to next week’s call for further discussion.
- MOTION by Paul to table this discussion to next Monday and provide it to TSC members for review. Second by Melva.
- VOTE: all in favor.
- Project approval request referred for discussion – EMS Hospital Outcomes Report: Melva reports the co-sponsor lines were simply missed. EC WG was a late add; Melva will get dates. She will send a note back asking them to explain how much content has been externally developed and to clean up the contradictory wording. Question regarding referencing UB-04 as a vocabulary (it is a form) – Freida mentions there are codes tied to the forms. Melva will ask them to clarify which vocabularies are being used from UB-04. ACTION: Anne to add update on the document to next Monday’s call.
- MOTION to adjourn by Paul, second by Melva.
- VOTE: all in favor. Call adjourned at 11:55 AM Eastern time
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.