Difference between revisions of "2015-07-13 TSC Call Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|International Affiliate Rep ||colspan="2"|Ad-Hoc
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|International Affiliate Rep ||colspan="2"|Ad-Hoc
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Ken McCaslin||.||Tony Julian||.|| Jean Duteau||.||
+
|Regrets||Ken McCaslin||x||Tony Julian||.|| Jean Duteau||.||
 
|-
 
|-
|.||John Quinn ||.||Lorraine Constable||.|| Giorgio Cangioli||.||
+
|x||John Quinn ||x||Lorraine Constable||x|| Giorgio Cangioli||.||
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Melva Peters||Regrets||Woody Beeler||.||Calvin Beebe||.||Freida Hall
+
|x||Melva Peters||Regrets||Woody Beeler||.||Calvin Beebe||x||Freida Hall
 
|-
 
|-
|.||John Roberts||.||Paul Knapp||.||Pat van Dyke||.||Andy Stechishin
+
|x||John Roberts||x||Paul Knapp||.||Pat van Dyke||x||Andy Stechishin
 
|-
 
|-
|.||  || ||Russ Hamm||.||  ||.||
+
|.||  ||x||Russ Hamm||.||  ||.||
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''ex officio''
 
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''ex officio''
Line 52: Line 52:
 
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|HL7 Staff
 
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|HL7 Staff
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote||.|| ||.||''obs1''||.||Anne Wizauer
+
|.||Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote||.|| ||x||Mario (Aegis)||x||Anne Wizauer
 
|-
 
|-
 
|.||Chuck Jaffe (CEO) <s> vote</s>||.||.||.||''obs2''||.||
 
|.||Chuck Jaffe (CEO) <s> vote</s>||.||.||.||''obs2''||.||
Line 78: Line 78:
 
<!--  Discussion  -->
 
<!--  Discussion  -->
 
#Discussion topics:  
 
#Discussion topics:  
#*GOM revisions out for peer review
+
#*GOM revisions out for peer review (Freida - 20 Minutes)
 +
#*Product issues ARB/TRAC working together (Tony - 10 minutes)
 +
#**Looking at the Kaiser slides
 +
 
 
====Management====
 
====Management====
 
#Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] –
 
#Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] –
Line 84: Line 87:
 
<!--    Approvals  -->
 
<!--    Approvals  -->
 
#Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
 
#Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
 +
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/8380/13316/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20v2015%20EMS_150513e.docx Project Approval Request] by the CIC WG of DESD for ''EMS Hospital Outcomes Report'' at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1186 Project Insight 1186] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=8380&start=0 TSC Tracker 8380] (30 minutes)
 +
#**Referred by T3SD re: lack of recorded co-sponsor approval and explanation of co-sponsor level of involvement;
 +
#**Referred by ArB for contradictory information regarding amount of externally developed content;
 +
#**Referred by SSD-SD for mentioning the use of UB04 as a vocabulary.
 
#Approval items for this week:
 
#Approval items for this week:
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/8380/13316/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20v2015%20EMS_150513e.docx Project Approval Request] by the CIC WG of DESD for ''EMS Hospital Outcomes Report'' at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1186 Project Insight 1186] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=8380&start=0 TSC Tracker 8380]
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/8405/13323/PASS%20ACCM%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20201506223%20-%20FTSD.docx Project Approval Request] by teh SOA WG of FTSD for ''Privacy, Access and Security Services Access Control Conceptual Model'' at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=200 Project Insight 200] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=8405&start=0 TSC Tracker 8405]
#**'''Referred by T3SD re: lack of recorded co-sponsor approval and how co-sponsors will be updated; also noted the use of R1 datatypes
 
 
<!--  Management      -->
 
<!--  Management      -->
 
<!--  Discussion  -->
 
<!--  Discussion  -->
Line 95: Line 101:
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
+
*Paul – addition to agenda for discussion next week: Use of SNOMED codes as mandatory in FHIR; larger discussion of using licensed codes across organization. Lorraine clarifies topic as using required or preferred value sets (appropriate usage of licensed code systems across HL7). Freida: HTA explored use of external vocabularies. Russ: HTA is aware of it and they are mandated to coordinate interaction with external terminology providers. Will monitor discussion over this week. '''ACTION: Anne to add to agenda for next Monday.'''
 
+
*'''MOTION''' by Andy to approve minutes of last week; Melva seconds.
 
+
*'''VOTE:''' all in favor
'''''Please don't forget to hang up from the conference call '' (VOIP users)'''
+
*GOM revisions out for peer review: Karen sent out a packet of the items up for review on 7/8; comments due 8/7.  Freida went through each change; no comments by the group. Encouraged further review and if comments, bring them back to the group. '''ACTION: Anne will add to 7/27 call for approval.'''
 
+
*Publishing risk assessment by ArB. ArB created some slides which Tony reviewed. Lorraine would add that we have a pattern of challenges that occur because we approach each of these problems individually without considering larger organization. Tony: comment came in about viability of SAIF and its real-world value. If you’re not applying SAIF principles, you’re not developing across enterprise. Lorraine: we also note that lots of projects have been initiated to deal with individual points of publishing risks; but they’re not being effective at moving forward because they’re not coordinated across the organization. John Q: how should the TSC proceed? Tony: it has to go to the EC – the issue is only getting worse. Not enough volunteers to do this properly. The Board needs to apply some money to the project to figure out the mitigation strategies. Melva: at TRAC, Brian Pech and Andy presented on publishing risks. Lorraine: this is ArB’s response to that content. Mario: Can the TSC add gravity to the level of risk that this represents? Paul: it would be valuable if the TSC added their comment to this before passing it on. '''ACTION: Anne to add to next week’s call for further discussion.'''
 +
**'''MOTION''' by Paul to table this discussion to next Monday and provide it to TSC members for review. Second by Melva.
 +
**'''VOTE:''' all in favor.
 +
*Project approval request referred for discussion – EMS Hospital Outcomes Report: Melva reports the co-sponsor lines were simply missed. EC WG was a late add; Melva will get dates. She will send a note back asking them to explain how much content has been externally developed and to clean up the contradictory wording. Question regarding referencing UB-04 as a vocabulary (it is a form) – Freida mentions there are codes tied to the forms. Melva will ask them to clarify which vocabularies are being used from UB-04. '''ACTION: Anne to add update on the document to next Monday’s call.'''
 +
*'''MOTION''' to adjourn by Paul, second by Melva.
 +
*'''VOTE:''' all in favor. Call adjourned at 11:55 AM Eastern time
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 105: Line 116:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
* .
+
*Melva to take back issues surrounding EMS Hospital Outcomes Report to WG for resolution
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>

Latest revision as of 21:22, 16 July 2015

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

Standing Conference Calls

TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.

GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
For those without access to microphone/speakers:
US: +1 (224)501-3318
Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
Access Code: 426-505-829
GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
NEW GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829

Date: 2015-07-13
Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented yes/no
Chair/CTO ArB International Affiliate Rep Ad-Hoc
Regrets Ken McCaslin x Tony Julian . Jean Duteau .
x John Quinn x Lorraine Constable x Giorgio Cangioli .
Domain Experts Foundation and Technology Structure and Semantic Design Technical and Support Services
x Melva Peters Regrets Woody Beeler . Calvin Beebe x Freida Hall
x John Roberts x Paul Knapp . Pat van Dyke x Andy Stechishin
. x Russ Hamm . .
ex officio Invited Guests Observers HL7 Staff
. Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote . x Mario (Aegis) x Anne Wizauer
. Chuck Jaffe (CEO) vote . . . obs2 .


. . . . .

Agenda

Housekeeping

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval -
  3. Approve Minutes of 2015-07-06 TSC Call Agenda

Governance

  1. Approval items:
  2. Discussion topics:
    • GOM revisions out for peer review (Freida - 20 Minutes)
    • Product issues ARB/TRAC working together (Tony - 10 minutes)
      • Looking at the Kaiser slides

Management

  1. Review action items
  2. Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
    • Project Approval Request by the CIC WG of DESD for EMS Hospital Outcomes Report at Project Insight 1186 and TSC Tracker 8380 (30 minutes)
      • Referred by T3SD re: lack of recorded co-sponsor approval and explanation of co-sponsor level of involvement;
      • Referred by ArB for contradictory information regarding amount of externally developed content;
      • Referred by SSD-SD for mentioning the use of UB04 as a vocabulary.
  3. Approval items for this week:
  4. Discussion topics:
  5. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
  6. Open Issues List

Minutes

  • Paul – addition to agenda for discussion next week: Use of SNOMED codes as mandatory in FHIR; larger discussion of using licensed codes across organization. Lorraine clarifies topic as using required or preferred value sets (appropriate usage of licensed code systems across HL7). Freida: HTA explored use of external vocabularies. Russ: HTA is aware of it and they are mandated to coordinate interaction with external terminology providers. Will monitor discussion over this week. ACTION: Anne to add to agenda for next Monday.
  • MOTION by Andy to approve minutes of last week; Melva seconds.
  • VOTE: all in favor
  • GOM revisions out for peer review: Karen sent out a packet of the items up for review on 7/8; comments due 8/7. Freida went through each change; no comments by the group. Encouraged further review and if comments, bring them back to the group. ACTION: Anne will add to 7/27 call for approval.
  • Publishing risk assessment by ArB. ArB created some slides which Tony reviewed. Lorraine would add that we have a pattern of challenges that occur because we approach each of these problems individually without considering larger organization. Tony: comment came in about viability of SAIF and its real-world value. If you’re not applying SAIF principles, you’re not developing across enterprise. Lorraine: we also note that lots of projects have been initiated to deal with individual points of publishing risks; but they’re not being effective at moving forward because they’re not coordinated across the organization. John Q: how should the TSC proceed? Tony: it has to go to the EC – the issue is only getting worse. Not enough volunteers to do this properly. The Board needs to apply some money to the project to figure out the mitigation strategies. Melva: at TRAC, Brian Pech and Andy presented on publishing risks. Lorraine: this is ArB’s response to that content. Mario: Can the TSC add gravity to the level of risk that this represents? Paul: it would be valuable if the TSC added their comment to this before passing it on. ACTION: Anne to add to next week’s call for further discussion.
    • MOTION by Paul to table this discussion to next Monday and provide it to TSC members for review. Second by Melva.
    • VOTE: all in favor.
  • Project approval request referred for discussion – EMS Hospital Outcomes Report: Melva reports the co-sponsor lines were simply missed. EC WG was a late add; Melva will get dates. She will send a note back asking them to explain how much content has been externally developed and to clean up the contradictory wording. Question regarding referencing UB-04 as a vocabulary (it is a form) – Freida mentions there are codes tied to the forms. Melva will ask them to clarify which vocabularies are being used from UB-04. ACTION: Anne to add update on the document to next Monday’s call.
  • MOTION to adjourn by Paul, second by Melva.
  • VOTE: all in favor. Call adjourned at 11:55 AM Eastern time

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Melva to take back issues surrounding EMS Hospital Outcomes Report to WG for resolution


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


© 2015 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.