Difference between revisions of "20121128 TSC Risk Assessment call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|colspan="2"|Facilitators ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Facilitators ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Austin Kreisler|| | + | |x ||Austin Kreisler||x|| Calvin Beebe ||x || Pat van Dyke |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Jane Curry || || Ed Tripp || || || | + | | ||Jane Curry ||x ||Ed Tripp || || || |
|} | |} | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
'''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | '''Supporting Documents'''<br/> | ||
| − | * | + | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7093/9903/ConsolidatedRiskAssessment20121128.xlsx Updated Risk assessment spreadsheet] from 2012-11-28 |
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| + | Call to order 9:04 AM EST | ||
| + | *Roll call - no additional TSC volunteers. | ||
| + | *Agenda Review | ||
| + | *Outstanding Action items: | ||
| + | **Pat - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7092/9902/BallotRisks_Strengths_Pat.xlsx Initial risk assessment] based on review of GOM Ballot sections (Chapter 14-16). | ||
| + | **Austin - Initial risk assessment based on review of TSC defining sections of the GOM (Section 9) | ||
| + | * Additional initial risk assessment assignments for GOM | ||
| + | **Jane - IP | ||
| + | **Calvin volunteers for Section 11 - conferences, education, etc | ||
| + | **Sections 5 (Pat), 8 on SDO liaisons/Appointed Positions (Ed), 10 Committees and Councils, 17 GOM Maintenance (Austin), 18 External IGs (Ed) | ||
| + | * January WGM planning for task force | ||
| + | *Continue Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7069/9859/ConsolidatedRiskAssessment20121114.xlsx Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet] | ||
| + | **Goal is to have first round of critical impact items for TSC discussion at Jan WGM. | ||
| + | **SI 2.21 risk not mitigated by TSC but contingency plans may be needed. Projects thought to be accelerated by funding not receiving funding. Change likelihood to 100%. Calvin reports the Finance committee is developing metrics to watch how membership is affected with the change. Need to split into multiple risks. | ||
| + | **SI 2.3.3 Education plan discussed. Split into two. Where is education plan? Action Item: Austin will determine the status of the education plan. | ||
| + | **Tooling strategy to follow same lines as Education plan | ||
| + | **Product strategy is what the BAM and product line evaluation is all about from SI 2.3.5. We will need to identify line item risks as the BAM develops. Producer vs consumer perspective discussed. Mark as yellow and develop fine grained risks with the BAM | ||
| + | Adjourned 10:02 AM | ||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 65: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
| − | * . | + | * Austin will determine the status of the education plan. |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 28 November 2012
TSC Risk Assessment Task Force Agenda/Minutes
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2012-11-28 Time: 9:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
| Quorum n/a | |||||||
| Facilitators | ArB | Members | Members | ||||
| x | Austin Kreisler | x | Calvin Beebe | x | Pat van Dyke | ||
| Jane Curry | x | Ed Tripp | |||||
Agenda
- Roll call
- Agenda Review
- Outstanding Action items:
- Pat - Initial risk assessment based on review of GOM Ballot sections (Chapter 14-16).
- Austin - Initial risk assessment based on review of TSC defining sections of the GOM
- Additional initial risk assessment assignments for GOM
- January WGM planning for task force
- Review initial risk assessments for GOM if available
- Continue Review Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet
Supporting Documents
- Updated Risk assessment spreadsheet from 2012-11-28
Minutes
Call to order 9:04 AM EST
- Roll call - no additional TSC volunteers.
- Agenda Review
- Outstanding Action items:
- Pat - Initial risk assessment based on review of GOM Ballot sections (Chapter 14-16).
- Austin - Initial risk assessment based on review of TSC defining sections of the GOM (Section 9)
- Additional initial risk assessment assignments for GOM
- Jane - IP
- Calvin volunteers for Section 11 - conferences, education, etc
- Sections 5 (Pat), 8 on SDO liaisons/Appointed Positions (Ed), 10 Committees and Councils, 17 GOM Maintenance (Austin), 18 External IGs (Ed)
- January WGM planning for task force
- Continue Review Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet
- Goal is to have first round of critical impact items for TSC discussion at Jan WGM.
- SI 2.21 risk not mitigated by TSC but contingency plans may be needed. Projects thought to be accelerated by funding not receiving funding. Change likelihood to 100%. Calvin reports the Finance committee is developing metrics to watch how membership is affected with the change. Need to split into multiple risks.
- SI 2.3.3 Education plan discussed. Split into two. Where is education plan? Action Item: Austin will determine the status of the education plan.
- Tooling strategy to follow same lines as Education plan
- Product strategy is what the BAM and product line evaluation is all about from SI 2.3.5. We will need to identify line item risks as the BAM develops. Producer vs consumer perspective discussed. Mark as yellow and develop fine grained risks with the BAM
Adjourned 10:02 AM
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
back to TSC Risk Assessment
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
