Difference between revisions of "2009-08-03 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
#Roll Call - | #Roll Call - | ||
#Accept Agenda - | #Accept Agenda - | ||
− | #Approve Minutes from [[2009-07- | + | #Approve Minutes from [[2009-07-20 TSC Call Minutes]] |
− | #Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] – | + | #Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] – |
+ | #*From [[2009-07-20_TSC_Call_Minutes]]: DAM Medical Records Composite Privacy – ACTION ITEM- ARB to review and discussion. How would one trace conformance back to this document. | ||
+ | #*From [[2009-07-20_TSC_Call_Minutes]]:HL7 Version 3 Standard: XML Implementation Technology Specification, Release 2 - need to clarify on whether this covers both datatypes and structures. ACTION ITEM: Woody will check with Grahame Grieve and then update the TSC | ||
+ | |||
===(20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals=== | ===(20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals=== | ||
# CEO Report - | # CEO Report - | ||
Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
# ArB Report - | # ArB Report - | ||
# Affiliates Report - | # Affiliates Report - | ||
+ | #*Some vendors asked the Italian HL7 Affiliate for having (a sort of) HL7 certification for their products. The real point is to define what does it mean to certify HL7 a product... but any HL7 affiliate faced somehow this issue? What is the position of HL7 org about that? | ||
# Domain Experts - | # Domain Experts - | ||
− | # Foundation & Technology - | + | #*Patient Care invited to discuss broader issues of clinical implementation guides: |
+ | #**'''''technical''''' consistency issues (CDA implementation guides, DCM specification, and V3 Messages all having different documentation forms) | ||
+ | #**'''''content''''' consistency issues (how do we detect inconsistency between specifications in a scalable and actionable way) | ||
+ | #**maintenance responsibility (how do the set of templates used in the implementation guides relate to the DCM and other work that is being done in Patient Care) | ||
+ | # Foundation & Technology - | ||
# Structure & Semantic Design - | # Structure & Semantic Design - | ||
# Technical & Support Services - | # Technical & Support Services - | ||
===(30 min) Discussion topics=== | ===(30 min) Discussion topics=== | ||
+ | #Ballot item e-vote review | ||
#[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List] | #[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List] | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/999/724/Product_Matrix_2009_v4.xls PSS] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=999&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 999]: TSC Product Visibility Project Proposal | ||
+ | #*:TSC Wiki [http://hl7t3f.org/wiki/index.php?title=2009_TSC_Product_Visibility Draft Product List] | ||
+ | #*:HL7 Wiki [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Product_List Draft Product List] | ||
+ | #*:Feedback on [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/999/750/Product_Matrix_2009_v5.xls draft matrix] on domains. | ||
+ | #*:Does this need to be approved as a project? Does the TSC wish to modify the product list before “approving” it? Are we ready to send the Product Brief templates to the appropriate work groups to fill out? | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1082&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 1082]:provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs, now tied to PS WG project to clean up Project Insight. See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/1082/752/Pilot_ProjectReport_20090711_SOA.xls example] | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=749&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 749]: Review the role of the steering divisions | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=745&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 745]: HQ to explore cost of providing secretarial support to the WGs | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1001&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 1001]: TSC Large Customer Partnerships Project Proposal | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/998/675/TSC%20Project%20Visibility%20-%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%202009v2.doc PSS] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=998&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 998]: TSC Project Visibility Proposal | ||
+ | #*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/997/743/TSC%20Work%20Group%20Visibility%20-%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%202009v2.doc PSS]at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=997&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 997]: TSC Work Group Visibility project proposal | ||
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]= | =[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]= | ||
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]= | =[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]= |
Revision as of 17:55, 24 July 2009
TSC - Technical Steering Committee
Monday, August 3, 2009 11:00 AM (US Eastern Daylight Time, GMT -5) To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466# GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/165215206 GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206
back to TSC Minutes and Agendas
Contents
Attendance
Expected
- Chair: Charlie McCay
- CTO: John Quinn
- Domain Experts: Austin Kreisler (primary), Ed Tripp (alternate)
- Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
- Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
- Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
- Affiliate: Ravi Natarajan
- ARB: Charlie Mead (primary), John Koisch (alternate)
- Ad-Hoc: Jim Case
- HQ: Lynn Laakso
Invited
- Charles Jaffe (CEO)
- Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Bob Dolin (HL7 Vice Chair)
- Marc Koehn (EA IP)
- Karen Van Hentenryck (HQ)
Apologies
- Ken McCaslin
Agenda
Meeting Admin
- Roll Call -
- Accept Agenda -
- Approve Minutes from 2009-07-20 TSC Call Minutes
- Review action items –
- From 2009-07-20_TSC_Call_Minutes: DAM Medical Records Composite Privacy – ACTION ITEM- ARB to review and discussion. How would one trace conformance back to this document.
- From 2009-07-20_TSC_Call_Minutes:HL7 Version 3 Standard: XML Implementation Technology Specification, Release 2 - need to clarify on whether this covers both datatypes and structures. ACTION ITEM: Woody will check with Grahame Grieve and then update the TSC
(20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
- CEO Report -
- CTO Report -
- EA IP Update
- ArB Report -
- Affiliates Report -
- Some vendors asked the Italian HL7 Affiliate for having (a sort of) HL7 certification for their products. The real point is to define what does it mean to certify HL7 a product... but any HL7 affiliate faced somehow this issue? What is the position of HL7 org about that?
- Domain Experts -
- Patient Care invited to discuss broader issues of clinical implementation guides:
- technical consistency issues (CDA implementation guides, DCM specification, and V3 Messages all having different documentation forms)
- content consistency issues (how do we detect inconsistency between specifications in a scalable and actionable way)
- maintenance responsibility (how do the set of templates used in the implementation guides relate to the DCM and other work that is being done in Patient Care)
- Patient Care invited to discuss broader issues of clinical implementation guides:
- Foundation & Technology -
- Structure & Semantic Design -
- Technical & Support Services -
(30 min) Discussion topics
- Ballot item e-vote review
- Open Issues List
- PSS at TSC Tracker 999: TSC Product Visibility Project Proposal
- TSC Wiki Draft Product List
- HL7 Wiki Draft Product List
- Feedback on draft matrix on domains.
- Does this need to be approved as a project? Does the TSC wish to modify the product list before “approving” it? Are we ready to send the Product Brief templates to the appropriate work groups to fill out?
- TSC Tracker 1082:provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs, now tied to PS WG project to clean up Project Insight. See example
- TSC Tracker 749: Review the role of the steering divisions
- TSC Tracker 745: HQ to explore cost of providing secretarial support to the WGs
- TSC Tracker 1001: TSC Large Customer Partnerships Project Proposal
- PSS at TSC Tracker 998: TSC Project Visibility Proposal
- PSSat TSC Tracker 997: TSC Work Group Visibility project proposal
- PSS at TSC Tracker 999: TSC Product Visibility Project Proposal