2014-07-07 TSC Call Agenda

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
NEW GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829

Date: 2014-07-07
Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented yes/no
Chair/CTO ArB International Affiliate Rep Ad-Hoc
x Ken McCaslin x Tony Julian . Jean Duteau x Austin Kreisler
x John Quinn x Lorraine Constable x Giorgio Cangioli .
Domain Experts Foundation and Technology Structure and Semantic Design Technical and Support Services
x Melva Peters x Woody Beeler . Calvin Beebe regrets Freida Hall
x John Roberts x Paul Knapp x Pat van Dyke x Andy Stechishin
ex officio Invited Guests Observers HL7 Staff
. Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote . . obs1 x Lynn Laakso
. Don Mon (Vice Chair) vote . . . obs2 .
. Chuck Jaffe (CEO) vote . . . .

Agenda

Housekeeping

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval -
  3. Approve Minutes of 2014-06-30 TSC Call Agenda

Governance

  1. Discussion topics:
    • Proposal for Unified response by Work Groups to Help Desk questions - Board Action item for TSC (Ken)
    • Review of action item to Develop formal definitions of backwards compatibility and dot-releases in the GOM. (Woody)

Management

  1. Review action items
    • Woody will craft a motion for the TSC position statement on new projects using R2B
    • 2585 Define list of machine-processable artifacts for membership benefit - Ken will follow up with Stan on who is the Marketing committee chair and the Board's intent with the list
  2. Approval items from e-vote: approve 8/0/0 with Ad-Hoc, 2 Affiliate, ARB, DESD, FTSD SSD SD and T3SD voting
  3. Approval items:
  4. Projects pending input:
  5. Discussion topics:
    • Status of UDI problem identification and response between HL7 and GS1 (P. Knapp)
  6. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
    • Congratulations to OO WG of SSD SD who has requested normative publication of HL7 Version 2.8.1 Messaging Standard at Project Insight #1000 and TSC Tracker 3370
  7. Open Issues List

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) none
  2. Agenda review and approval - Lynn received a publication extension request for a CQI DSTU, and Melva has an outstanding item on SAIF wording for WG Mission and Charter statements
  3. Approve Minutes of 2014-06-30 TSC Call Agenda approved by general consent

Governance

  1. Discussion topics:
    • Proposal for Unified response by Work Groups to Help Desk questions - Board Action item for TSC (Ken)
      • Uniform Response from WG co-chairs to Help Desk Requests (Response to Board Request) at TSC Tracker #3227
      • Timeline - Proposed approval by 4 August 2014
      • Ken reviews the document which has also been reviewed by Dave Hamill, John Quinn and John Roberts. Woody asks what sort of responses have been required previously and can we get an example. Austin notes one from SDWG. Lorraine adds you cannot tell from the help desk side what level response was required. Ken clarifies the process documented here is to manage the escalation not to manage the responses. Ken will reach out to Diego to get feedback on what leads up to this tier 3 level 1, 2, 3 responses. Austin describes the SDWG process which took longer than the 24 hour turnaround requested, and in order to have a consensus view with the WG took even more time. The answers given by the help desk and the consensus view turned out to be 180 degrees differently aligned. Lorraine notes that there has been a change in the perception of what the help desk support role is once handed off. Austin will send the email thread to Ken to follow up.
      • Objection to the "must respond within 24 hours" and one week response time from the work group language reviewed. Ken notes that he will welcome review comments suggested with change tracking on.
    • Review of action item to Develop formal definitions of backwards compatibility and dot-releases in the GOM. (Woody) - no report; asks Lynn to check in with him late week to see if they're done.

Management

  1. Review action items
    • Woody will craft a motion for the TSC position statement on new projects using R2B - no report
    • 2585 Define list of machine-processable artifacts for membership benefit - Ken will follow up with Stan on who is the Marketing committee chair and the Board's intent with the list
  2. Approval items from e-vote: approve 8/0/0 with Ad-Hoc, 2 Affiliate, ARB, DESD, FTSD SSD SD and T3SD voting
  3. Approval items:
  4. Projects pending input:
  5. Discussion topics:
    • Status of UDI problem identification and response between HL7 and GS1 (P. Knapp) - waiting for response from GS1.
    • SAIF wording for WG Mission and Charter statements (Melva)
      • WG in DESD didn't have any wording and were directed to review the last guidance from TSC on SAIF wording. Since SAIF project being reviewed/revamped we have not yet changed guidance to WGs on M&C. Lorraine notes that the reference to the SAIF IG was removed. We may need to resurrect which verbiage to use and Lynn suggests we work it into the M&C guidance and template document. ACTION ITEM: Lorraine and Lynn will work on this.
  6. Tony joins.
  7. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
    • Congratulations to OO WG of SSD SD who has requested normative publication of HL7 Version 2.8.1 Messaging Standard at Project Insight #1000 and TSC Tracker 3370
    • Paul asks about the result of the conformance testing poll. Ken will have that ready for next week's discussion.

Adjourned 11:26 AM.

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Austin will send the email thread to Ken to follow up on Help desk work group resolution conflict.
  • Lorraine and Lynn will work on history of recommended SAIF wording in WG M&C
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • 2014-07-14 TSC Call Agenda.
  • Freida had noted a desire to identify what sort of artifacts a project would produce in the project name - discuss next week.
  • Help desk work group resolution conflict. (15 mins).
  • recommended SAIF wording in WG M&C


© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.