Difference between revisions of "FTSD-ConCalls-20090224"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
***'''Discussion'''
 
***'''Discussion'''
 
#If an issue is raised and cannot be resolved in the ArB, how is it resolved?
 
#If an issue is raised and cannot be resolved in the ArB, how is it resolved?
#How does the SD rep to the ArB work with SD and how does the SD coummnicate to the ArB via representation
+
#How does the SD rep to the ArB work with SD and how does the SD communicate to the ArB via representation
 
* DSTU extension update  
 
* DSTU extension update  
  
 
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]]
 
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]]

Revision as of 16:37, 24 February 2009

FTSD Conference call

Attendees

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
  • Implementation/Conformance
    • Jason Rock
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
    • Ioana Singureanu
    • Woody Beeler
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • Ken Rubin
    • Galen Mulrooney
  • Templates
    • Mark Shafarman
  • Vocabulary
    • Beverly Knight

Minutes

Feb. 10th 2009

  1. Approve previous meeting minutes for Conference Call: February 10th 2009- unanimous
  2. Adopt Agenda - unanimous

Agenda

  • New Project Templates Work group (Mark Shafarman): Mark will make additional revisions and distribute the document to the FTSD list.
  • To better support the development of the SAEAF and Behavioral Framework we need liaison contacts identified:
    • Security: Brend Bloebel/Mike Davis
    • Implementation/Conformance:
    • Modeling and Methodology: Lloyd McKenzie
      • Discussion
  1. If an issue is raised and cannot be resolved in the ArB, how is it resolved?
  2. How does the SD rep to the ArB work with SD and how does the SD communicate to the ArB via representation
  • DSTU extension update

Back to Meetings