FTSD-ConCalls-20090224

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FTSD Conference call

Attendees

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
  • Implementation/Conformance
    • Jason Rock
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
    • Ioana Singureanu
    • Woody Beeler
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • Ken Rubin
    • Galen Mulrooney
  • Templates
    • Mark Shafarman
  • Vocabulary
    • Beverly Knight

Minutes

Feb. 10th 2009

  1. Approve previous meeting minutes for Conference Call: February 10th 2009- unanimous
  2. Adopt Agenda - unanimous

Agenda

  • (20 min) New Project Templates Work group (Mark Shafarman): Mark will make additional revisions and distribute the document to the FTSD list.
  • (20 min) ArB Collaboration: To better support the development of the SAEAF and Behavioral Framework we were asked to identify liaisons for our work group:
    • Security: Brend Bloebel/Mike Davis
    • Implementation/Conformance:
    • Modeling and Methodology: Lloyd McKenzie

The concern of the groups is that responsibilities cross SD/ArB boundaries and often SAEAF contradicts decisions made in a specific work group. The HDF has assigned explicit responsibility to work groups for those chapters that fall into their area of responsibility.

Motion (Jason/Ken) unanimous: Get clarity about which group is responsible for specific sections of the SAEAF (e.g. Conformance) the ArB or WG. 
The SD will produce a candidate list identifying artifacts and responsibilities and submit it to the TSC. 
  • DSTU extension update

Questions

  1. If an issue is raised and cannot be resolved in the ArB, how is it resolved?
  2. How does the SD rep to the ArB work with SD and how does the SD communicate to the ArB via representation?
  3. We need to identify responsibilities for the WGs in our Steering Division using a RASCI chart?
  4. A SD peer review that ensures that the SD members are staying behind our comments to the SAEAF.
  5. SAEAF defined conformance differently than Implementation and Conformance: who is the responsible body for Conformance overall?

Back to Meetings