Difference between revisions of "FTSD-ConCalls-20080930"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
# ''(05 min)'' Roll Call | # ''(05 min)'' Roll Call | ||
# ''(05 min)'' Approve previous meeting minutes[[FTSD-WGM-20080915| Workgroup Meeting: September 15th 2008]] Woody/Beverly 5-0-1, Approve Agenda: 6-0-1 | # ''(05 min)'' Approve previous meeting minutes[[FTSD-WGM-20080915| Workgroup Meeting: September 15th 2008]] Woody/Beverly 5-0-1, Approve Agenda: 6-0-1 | ||
− | #''(5 min)'' RIM or BRIDG, provisionally approve RIM ballot scope statement | + | #''(5 min)'' RIM or BRIDG, |
+ | Charlie Mead indicated in an RCRIM meeting that semantic interoperability is based on the BRIDG. The implication is that the RIM cannot provide semantic interoperability. A domain analysis cannot be used for interoperability. RCRIM has a motion to "all messages before going to DSTU have to be harmonized to BRIDG - for RCRIM". The BRIDGE may be maintained as new requirements are developed, if necessary. Individual members of the RCRIM are not in agreement with the RCRIM drafted motion. | ||
+ | #''(5 min)'' RIM balloting: provisionally approve RIM ballot scope statement | ||
+ | ##* Comments | ||
#''(10 min)'' SAEAF update (Tony Julian): peer review | #''(10 min)'' SAEAF update (Tony Julian): peer review |
Revision as of 15:25, 30 September 2008
Foundation and Technology Steering Division Conference Call
FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division
Attendees
(expected)
- Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
- Implementation/Conformance
- Jason Rock
- Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
- Tony Julian
- RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
- Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
- Ioana Singureanu
- Woody Beeler
- Security
- Glenn Marshall
- Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
- Ken Rubin
- Templates
- Vocabulary
- Beverly Knight
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call
- (05 min) Approve previous meeting minutes Workgroup Meeting: September 15th 2008 Woody/Beverly 5-0-1, Approve Agenda: 6-0-1
- (5 min) RIM or BRIDG,
Charlie Mead indicated in an RCRIM meeting that semantic interoperability is based on the BRIDG. The implication is that the RIM cannot provide semantic interoperability. A domain analysis cannot be used for interoperability. RCRIM has a motion to "all messages before going to DSTU have to be harmonized to BRIDG - for RCRIM". The BRIDGE may be maintained as new requirements are developed, if necessary. Individual members of the RCRIM are not in agreement with the RCRIM drafted motion.
- (5 min) RIM balloting: provisionally approve RIM ballot scope statement
- Comments
- (10 min) SAEAF update (Tony Julian): peer review