Difference between revisions of "Concall-20080929"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
=Agenda=
 
=Agenda=
 
#'''''(5 min)'' Meeting Admin'''
 
#'''''(5 min)'' Meeting Admin'''
##Roll Call - The following individuals joined the call:   
+
##Roll Call - The following individuals joined the call:  Ken McCaslin, John Quinn, Charlie McCay, John Koisch, Jim Case, Woody Beeler, Austin Kreisler, Calvin Beebe, Chuck Meyer, Helen Stevens Love, Ioana Singureanu and Karen Van Hentenryck
##Accept Agenda -  
+
##Accept Agenda - McCay would like to add the architecture project to the discussion.
 
##Approve Minutes from  
 
##Approve Minutes from  
##*[[meeting-20080916]] -
+
##*[[meeting-20080916]] - Minutes approved unanimously.
##*[[meeting-20080914]]
+
##*[[meeting-20080914]] - Minutes approved unanimously.
##*[[meeting-20080913]]   
+
##*[[meeting-20080913]]  - McCay noted a typo from itra to inter.  Minutes approved unanimously.
 
#'''''(20 min)'' Standing Committee Reports/Approvals'''
 
#'''''(20 min)'' Standing Committee Reports/Approvals'''
## CEO Report -  
+
## CEO Report - No report was submitted
## CTO Report -  
+
## CTO Report - Quinn reported that he spent a fair amount of time interviewing candidates for the TSC Analyst position.  Quinn and Hammond spent .5 day in Nashville with TN government.  Nothing else to report.
## ArB Report -  
+
## ArB Report - John Koish reported that they finalized dates for first two out of cycle meetings.  First mtg will be Oct 12-13, f2f will be in conjunction in Harmonziation on Nov 12-14. Those meetings will be in Rockville, MD.  Dec 4-5 are the dates for the final meeting. The F2F will be hosted by NCI.  Oct meeting will be focues on harmonziation open issues that weren't rsolved during WGM:  1) taking next step on behavioral framework.  2) Service classificaiton scheme;  3) harmonziation with HSSP. 
## Affiliates Report -  
+
## Affiliates Report - Nothing to report
## Domain Experts -  
+
## Domain Experts - Austin Kreisler reported on Motion to accept project scope statement. Another couple of projects have been put forward to the Steering Division. 
##* '''MOTION:''' Approve the Project Scope Statement for Lab Related CMETs [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/738/561/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement_LabRelatedCMETs.doc].
+
##* '''MOTION:''' Approve the Project Scope Statement for Lab Related CMETs [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/738/561/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement_LabRelatedCMETs.doc]. Seconded by McCaslin.  '''ACTION ITEM''':  Van Hentenryck will update the process document and distribute the project scope to the other SDs. We will wait a week while the other SD have an opportunity to review the proposal.  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
##* [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FTSD_SWOT_and_Three-year_Strategic_Plan_Summary SWOT and Three-year Strategic Plans for FDSD] incomplete.
+
##* [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FTSD_SWOT_and_Three-year_Strategic_Plan_Summary SWOT and Three-year Strategic Plans for FDSD] incomplete.  She feels this is part of the busy work of seeing things to people.  
##* We need to change the way SDs operate as a rubber stamp to become more deliberative. One such change would be to work with our SD reps to ArB to review the new Architecture Framework for HL7.  
+
##* We need to change the way SDs operate as a rubber stamp to become more deliberative. One such change would be to work with our SD reps to ArB to review the new Architecture Framework for HL7. Jim Case noted that their SD has a very small number of WGs that comment on the majority of the work. Those co-chairs that take their roles seriously tend to participate.  TSC doesn't want to add busy work on the volunteers.  They need to understand that this work will improve the structure of the organization.  McCay sees SD function as coordination between groups. Detailed work is delegated to WGs. Main function os tSC to ensure where work is being done rather than being the place where work is being done.  Kreisler sees the TSC as arbitrators. Kriesler noted that they use email and electronic voting for decisions as they have such a large number of WGs. '''ACTION ITEM''': Review the role and definition of the Steering Divisions. '''ACTION ITEM''':  Singureanu suggested that we clearly articulate the value of the SWOT and three-year plans. Capture this in Action Item List. If there are no consequences, some WGs won't follow the rules. ACTION ITEM: 
## Structure & Semantic Design -  
+
## Structure & Semantic Design - Nothing to report.
## Technical & Support Services -   
+
## Technical & Support Services -  McCaslin reported that their rirst meeting is this coming week.
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''
 
#*TSC Issue list
 
#*TSC Issue list
 
#*Conference calling issues - Austin Kreisler
 
#*Conference calling issues - Austin Kreisler
 +
#*Enterprise architecture
  
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list|Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)]]=
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list|Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)]]=

Revision as of 15:38, 29 September 2008

TSC - Technical Steering Committee

Monday, September 29, 2008 11:00 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/822618174
GoToMeeting ID: 822-618-174 

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Jim Case (primary), Austin Kreisler (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Frank Oemig,
  • ARB Chair: Charlie Mead or John Koisch (ArB alternate)
  • HQ: Karen Van Hentenryck

invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO); Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Chuck Meyer (HL7 Vice Chair); Ed Tripp (newly elected TSC member); Ravi Natarajan (newly elected TSC member)

Apologies

  • Charlie Mead
  • Gregg Seppala

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call - The following individuals joined the call: Ken McCaslin, John Quinn, Charlie McCay, John Koisch, Jim Case, Woody Beeler, Austin Kreisler, Calvin Beebe, Chuck Meyer, Helen Stevens Love, Ioana Singureanu and Karen Van Hentenryck
    2. Accept Agenda - McCay would like to add the architecture project to the discussion.
    3. Approve Minutes from
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report - No report was submitted
    2. CTO Report - Quinn reported that he spent a fair amount of time interviewing candidates for the TSC Analyst position. Quinn and Hammond spent .5 day in Nashville with TN government. Nothing else to report.
    3. ArB Report - John Koish reported that they finalized dates for first two out of cycle meetings. First mtg will be Oct 12-13, f2f will be in conjunction in Harmonziation on Nov 12-14. Those meetings will be in Rockville, MD. Dec 4-5 are the dates for the final meeting. The F2F will be hosted by NCI. Oct meeting will be focues on harmonziation open issues that weren't rsolved during WGM: 1) taking next step on behavioral framework. 2) Service classificaiton scheme; 3) harmonziation with HSSP.
    4. Affiliates Report - Nothing to report
    5. Domain Experts - Austin Kreisler reported on Motion to accept project scope statement. Another couple of projects have been put forward to the Steering Division.
      • MOTION: Approve the Project Scope Statement for Lab Related CMETs [1]. Seconded by McCaslin. ACTION ITEM: Van Hentenryck will update the process document and distribute the project scope to the other SDs. We will wait a week while the other SD have an opportunity to review the proposal.
    6. Foundation & Technology -
      • SWOT and Three-year Strategic Plans for FDSD incomplete. She feels this is part of the busy work of seeing things to people.
      • We need to change the way SDs operate as a rubber stamp to become more deliberative. One such change would be to work with our SD reps to ArB to review the new Architecture Framework for HL7. Jim Case noted that their SD has a very small number of WGs that comment on the majority of the work. Those co-chairs that take their roles seriously tend to participate. TSC doesn't want to add busy work on the volunteers. They need to understand that this work will improve the structure of the organization. McCay sees SD function as coordination between groups. Detailed work is delegated to WGs. Main function os tSC to ensure where work is being done rather than being the place where work is being done. Kreisler sees the TSC as arbitrators. Kriesler noted that they use email and electronic voting for decisions as they have such a large number of WGs. ACTION ITEM: Review the role and definition of the Steering Divisions. ACTION ITEM: Singureanu suggested that we clearly articulate the value of the SWOT and three-year plans. Capture this in Action Item List. If there are no consequences, some WGs won't follow the rules. ACTION ITEM:
    7. Structure & Semantic Design - Nothing to report.
    8. Technical & Support Services - McCaslin reported that their rirst meeting is this coming week.
  3. (30 min) Discussion topics
    • TSC Issue list
    • Conference calling issues - Austin Kreisler
    • Enterprise architecture

Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)

Click for TSC Action Item List

  • SD co-chairs to contract Wilfred Bonney to establish a GForge site for their SD
  • TSC to create project scope statement for roll out of Enterprise Architecture work
  • Do we