Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT and three year plan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Charliemccay (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Strengths | *Strengths | ||
** Respected membership | ** Respected membership | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Committed membership |
| − | ** Support from board, HQ, and | + | ** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members |
| − | ** | + | ** Responsive |
*Weakness | *Weakness | ||
** Limited time | ** Limited time | ||
| − | + | ** Limited control over resources | |
| − | ** Limited | ||
*Opportunities | *Opportunities | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Linkage with roadmap |
| − | ** | + | ** Establish and drive Product Strategy |
*Threats | *Threats | ||
** Loss of initial momentum | ** Loss of initial momentum | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Creating overheads without visible return |
| − | ** | + | ** Alienate key thought leaders |
== 3 year plan == | == 3 year plan == | ||
* Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan | * Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan | ||
| − | |||
* Continuous improvement plan | * Continuous improvement plan | ||
* Communications plan | * Communications plan | ||
| + | *Collaborate with CTO to develop and deploy an HL7 Quality Plan | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 12 February 2010
This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay, and has not been reviewed by the TSC or others
- Strengths
- Respected membership
- Committed membership
- Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members
- Responsive
- Weakness
- Limited time
- Limited control over resources
- Opportunities
- Linkage with roadmap
- Establish and drive Product Strategy
- Threats
- Loss of initial momentum
- Creating overheads without visible return
- Alienate key thought leaders
3 year plan
- Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan
- Continuous improvement plan
- Communications plan
- Collaborate with CTO to develop and deploy an HL7 Quality Plan
