Difference between revisions of "2009-06-15 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
##*Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1. See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1062&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 1062] | ##*Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1. See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1062&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 1062] | ||
## Foundation & Technology - | ## Foundation & Technology - | ||
+ | ##*Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued) | ||
## Structure & Semantic Design - | ## Structure & Semantic Design - | ||
## Technical & Support Services - | ## Technical & Support Services - | ||
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics''' | #'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics''' | ||
#*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16 | #*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16 | ||
+ | #*Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes. | ||
+ | #**[http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/techNewsletter/HL7_TECHNEWSLETTER_20081125.pdf#page=8 Why do three year plans?] | ||
+ | #** How do we provide linkage and feedback to the Roadmap (and the Roadmap Task Force)? | ||
+ | #*Review and discuss [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=52 Work Group Health documents], and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta | ||
+ | #**Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics. | ||
#*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List] | #*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List] | ||
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]= | =[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]= | ||
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]= | =[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]= |
Revision as of 13:08, 11 June 2009
TSC - Technical Steering Committee
Monday, June 15, 2009 11:00 AM (US Eastern Daylight Time, GMT -5) To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466# GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/165215206 GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206
back to TSC Minutes and Agendas
Contents
Attendance
Expected
- Chair: Charlie McCay
- CTO: John Quinn
- Domain Experts: Austin Kreisler (primary), Ed Tripp (alternate)
- Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
- Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
- Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
- Affiliate: Ravi Natarajan
- ARB: Charlie Mead (primary), John Koisch (alternate)
- Ad-Hoc: Jim Case
- HQ: Lynn Laakso
Invited
- Charles Jaffe (CEO)
- Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Bob Dolin (HL7 Vice Chair)
- Marc Koehn (EA IP)
- Karen Van Hentenryck (HQ)
Apologies
- Charlie McCay
Agenda
- (5 min) Meeting Admin
- Roll Call -
- Accept Agenda -
- Approve Minutes from
- Review action items –
- (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
- CEO Report -
- CTO Report -
- EA IP Update
- ArB Report -
- Affiliates Report -
- Domain Experts -
- Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1. See TSC Tracker # 1062
- Foundation & Technology -
- Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued)
- Structure & Semantic Design -
- Technical & Support Services -
- (30 min) Discussion topics
- Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
- Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes.
- Why do three year plans?
- How do we provide linkage and feedback to the Roadmap (and the Roadmap Task Force)?
- Review and discuss Work Group Health documents, and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta
- Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics.
- Open Issues List