Difference between revisions of "2009-06-15 TSC Call Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:
 
##*Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1.  See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1062&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 1062]
 
##*Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1.  See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1062&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 1062]
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 +
##*Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued)
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -  
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -  
 
## Technical & Support Services -   
 
## Technical & Support Services -   
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''  
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''  
 
#*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
 
#*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
 +
#*Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes.
 +
#**[http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/techNewsletter/HL7_TECHNEWSLETTER_20081125.pdf#page=8 Why do three year plans?]
 +
#** How do we provide linkage and feedback to the Roadmap (and the Roadmap Task Force)?
 +
#*Review and discuss [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=52 Work Group Health documents], and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta
 +
#**Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics.
 
#*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List]
 
#*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List]
  
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]=
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]=
 
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]=
 
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]=

Revision as of 13:08, 11 June 2009

TSC - Technical Steering Committee

Monday, June 15, 2009 11:00 AM (US Eastern Daylight Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/165215206
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206 

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • Chair: Charlie McCay
  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Austin Kreisler (primary), Ed Tripp (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Ravi Natarajan
  • ARB: Charlie Mead (primary), John Koisch (alternate)
  • Ad-Hoc: Jim Case
  • HQ: Lynn Laakso

Invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO)
  • Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Bob Dolin (HL7 Vice Chair)
  • Marc Koehn (EA IP)
  • Karen Van Hentenryck (HQ)

Apologies

  • Charlie McCay

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call -
    2. Accept Agenda -
    3. Approve Minutes from
    4. Review action items
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report -
    2. CTO Report -
    3. ArB Report -
    4. Affiliates Report -
    5. Domain Experts -
      • Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1. See TSC Tracker # 1062
    6. Foundation & Technology -
      • Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued)
    7. Structure & Semantic Design -
    8. Technical & Support Services -
  3. (30 min) Discussion topics
    • Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
    • Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes.
    • Review and discuss Work Group Health documents, and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta
      • Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics.
    • Open Issues List

Future Agenda item list

Click for TSC Action Item List