Difference between revisions of "Concall-20081027"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Agenda) |
m (→Agenda) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
##*QUESTION: It is unclear how providing a yearly balloted version of the RIM will affect any open-source tooling that relies on the RIM or an external SDO that wishes to harmonized its information models with HL7. These are questions the TSC needs to answer. | ##*QUESTION: It is unclear how providing a yearly balloted version of the RIM will affect any open-source tooling that relies on the RIM or an external SDO that wishes to harmonized its information models with HL7. These are questions the TSC needs to answer. | ||
## Structure & Semantic Design - | ## Structure & Semantic Design - | ||
− | ##*Request from Alschuler to approve balloting the Assessment template document. From Alschuler: Unless I hear objections raised, will continue to assume that we can move ahead with this for the Dec/Jan cycle. The rationale for the push is to meet the requirement identified by HITSP. Note that Patient Care is a co-sponsor of the ballot (Willem and others were on the call with us this morning) and that we have added IHE and HITSP as interested parties. | + | ##*Request from Alschuler to approve balloting the Assessment template document in upcoming ballot cycle. http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/794/583/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement-Assessmenttemplate%20v81.doc] From Alschuler: Unless I hear objections raised, will continue to assume that we can move ahead with this for the Dec/Jan cycle. The rationale for the push is to meet the requirement identified by HITSP. Note that Patient Care is a co-sponsor of the ballot (Willem and others were on the call with us this morning) and that we have added IHE and HITSP as interested parties. |
## Technical & Support Services - | ## Technical & Support Services - | ||
##*Role of the SD Project Facilitator (TSC Issue: 756) | ##*Role of the SD Project Facilitator (TSC Issue: 756) |
Revision as of 16:48, 23 October 2008
TSC - Technical Steering Committee
Monday, October 27, 2008 11:00 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5) To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466# GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/822618174 GoToMeeting ID: 822-618-174
back to TSC Minutes and Agendas
Contents
Attendance
Expected
- CTO: John Quinn
- Domain Experts: Jim Case (primary), Austin Kreisler (alternate)
- Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
- Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
- Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
- Affiliate: Frank Oemig,
- ARB Chair: Charlie Mead
- HQ: Karen Van Hentenryck
invited
- Charles Jaffe (CEO); Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Chuck Meyer (HL7 Vice Chair); Ed Tripp (newly elected TSC member); Ravi Natarajan (newly elected TSC member)
Apologies
Agenda
- (5 min) Meeting Admin
- Roll Call - The following individuals joined the call:
- Accept Agenda -
- Approve Minutes from concall-20081020 -
- (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
- CEO Report -
- CTO Report -
- ArB Report -
- Recommendation for public posting/dispositioning of SAEAF document comments
- Affiliates Report -
- Domain Experts -
- MOTION by SD: To approve the updated ICSR R3 project scope [1]
- QUESTION - We have a work group that is considering creating a project to creat and ballot a HL7 2.3.1 Implementation Guide. Since 2.3.1 is no longer a supported HL7 version, should HL7 be balloting Implementation Guides for versions that are no longer supported?
- Foundation & Technology -
- QUESTION: It is unclear how providing a yearly balloted version of the RIM will affect any open-source tooling that relies on the RIM or an external SDO that wishes to harmonized its information models with HL7. These are questions the TSC needs to answer.
- Structure & Semantic Design -
- Request from Alschuler to approve balloting the Assessment template document in upcoming ballot cycle. http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/794/583/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement-Assessmenttemplate%20v81.doc] From Alschuler: Unless I hear objections raised, will continue to assume that we can move ahead with this for the Dec/Jan cycle. The rationale for the push is to meet the requirement identified by HITSP. Note that Patient Care is a co-sponsor of the ballot (Willem and others were on the call with us this morning) and that we have added IHE and HITSP as interested parties.
- Technical & Support Services -
- Role of the SD Project Facilitator (TSC Issue: 756)
- (30 min) Discussion topics