Difference between revisions of "Concall-20080609"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
## Affiliates Report -  
 
## Affiliates Report -  
 
## Domain Experts -  
 
## Domain Experts -  
 +
###'''MOTION''' to approve the following projects
 +
###*Vital Records DAM from PHER [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/609/482/HL7%20VR%20DAM%20Project%20Scope%20May%202008.doc]
 +
###*Immunization DAM from PHER [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/610/483/PHER%20Immunization%20DAM%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%2020080523.doc]
 +
###*Detailed Clinical Models from Patient Care [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/611/484/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement_PatientCare2008DCM-ID320.doc]
 +
###*Clinical Content Development, Harmonization and Definition from CIC [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/612/485/PSS_CIC_ClinicalContent%20(2)_05202008.doc]
 +
###The Domain Experts SD approved a project scope statement for HL7 Implementation Guidance for Unique Object Identifiers (OIDs), however, there was considerable discussion regarding whether or not it was appropriate for this project to be driven by the Attachements WG. This project needs additional discussion in a broader context that just the Domain Experts SD. [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/613/486/approved%20oid%20guidance%20hl7_project_scope_statement_v1_2_12.doc]
 +
###*A process question was raised as part of the discussion of this project. Was it appropriate for the Domain Experts to approve this project? Instead of approving the project some feel the SD should reject it and have the work group work with INM and others to move it forward.
 
## Foundation & Technology - MOTION by SD: To approve modifiations to JAVA committee name/mission charter [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/583/478/RIMBA-Mission-Charter-approved.doc]
 
## Foundation & Technology - MOTION by SD: To approve modifiations to JAVA committee name/mission charter [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/583/478/RIMBA-Mission-Charter-approved.doc]
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -   
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -   

Revision as of 21:05, 6 June 2008

TSC - Technical Steering Committee

Monday, June 9th, 2008 11:00 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/822618174
GoToMeeting ID: 822-618-174 

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Jim Case (primary), Austin Kreisler (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Frank Oemig,
  • ARB Chair: Charlie Mead
  • HQ: Karen Van Hentenryck

invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO); Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Chuck Meyer (HL7 Vice Chair)

Apologies

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call -
    2. Accept Agenda -
    3. Approve Minutes from concall-20080602 -
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report -
    2. CTO Report -
    3. ARB report -
    4. Affiliates Report -
    5. Domain Experts -
      1. MOTION to approve the following projects
        • Vital Records DAM from PHER [1]
        • Immunization DAM from PHER [2]
        • Detailed Clinical Models from Patient Care [3]
        • Clinical Content Development, Harmonization and Definition from CIC [4]
      2. The Domain Experts SD approved a project scope statement for HL7 Implementation Guidance for Unique Object Identifiers (OIDs), however, there was considerable discussion regarding whether or not it was appropriate for this project to be driven by the Attachements WG. This project needs additional discussion in a broader context that just the Domain Experts SD. [5]
        • A process question was raised as part of the discussion of this project. Was it appropriate for the Domain Experts to approve this project? Instead of approving the project some feel the SD should reject it and have the work group work with INM and others to move it forward.
    6. Foundation & Technology - MOTION by SD: To approve modifiations to JAVA committee name/mission charter [6]
    7. Structure & Semantic Design -
    8. Technical & Support Services -
  3. (30 min) Discussion topics
    1. Review suggested GOM updates
      • process for electing affiliates represenatives to the TSC (to include size-determined number of votes
      • process for dissolving work group (as discussed on previous call)

Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)

Click for TSC Action Item List