Difference between revisions of "Concall-20080519"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
## Domain Experts -  
 
## Domain Experts -  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 +
The Steering Division approved the [
 +
 +
http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/168/DynamicFrameworkRequirements_and_Scope_20080509.doc Project Scope Statement] submitted by the ArB regarding. The SD approved at the call on May 13th. However, the
 +
ArB intended to submit the document as a deliverable of an existing project rather than a scope statement for a new project. The document was sent for review on May 14th and the SD was given until May 16th to review the document: [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/169/Definitions%20and%20Assumptions--DynamicModelFramework.doc Definitions and Assumptions - Dynamic Framework] and to provide feedback. To date, four additional requirements were suggested to the project team for consideration. The SD discussed them on the list.
 +
*      Provide a deterministic mapping of current HL7-specific behavioral concepts (triggers, application roles, interactions, message wrappers) to standard- based behavioral concepts specified by the new framework.”
 +
 +
*      Describe system behavior and receiver responsibilities (e.g. Order Processing,  V2 Chapter 2 acknowledgement processing)
 +
 +
*      Provide a standard-based, computable representation of the system behaviors and receiver responsibilities (e.g. WSDL, WSDL-CDL, BPEL)
 +
 +
*      Publish system behavior and receiver responsibilities specifications as a web site (e.g. similar to javadoc) or “book” reports (RTF, PDF, etc.)
 +
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -
 
## Technical & Support Services -  
 
## Technical & Support Services -  

Revision as of 06:43, 19 May 2008

TSC - Technical Steering Committee

Monday, May 19th, 2008 11:00 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/822618174
GoToMeeting ID: 822-618-174 

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Jim Case (primary), Austin Kreisler (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Frank Oemig,
  • ARB Chair: Charlie Mead
  • HQ: Karen Van Hentenryck

invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO); Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Chuck Meyer (HL7 Vice Chair)

Apologies

  • Gregg Seppala (S&SD SD)
  • Ioana Singureanu (FT SD)

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call -
    2. Accept Agenda -
    3. Approve Minutes from meeting-20080503 and meeting-20080504
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report -
    2. CTO Report -
    3. ARB report -
    4. Affiliates Report -
    5. Domain Experts -
    6. Foundation & Technology -

The Steering Division approved the [

http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/168/DynamicFrameworkRequirements_and_Scope_20080509.doc Project Scope Statement] submitted by the ArB regarding. The SD approved at the call on May 13th. However, the ArB intended to submit the document as a deliverable of an existing project rather than a scope statement for a new project. The document was sent for review on May 14th and the SD was given until May 16th to review the document: Definitions and Assumptions - Dynamic Framework and to provide feedback. To date, four additional requirements were suggested to the project team for consideration. The SD discussed them on the list.

  • Provide a deterministic mapping of current HL7-specific behavioral concepts (triggers, application roles, interactions, message wrappers) to standard- based behavioral concepts specified by the new framework.”
  • Describe system behavior and receiver responsibilities (e.g. Order Processing, V2 Chapter 2 acknowledgement processing)
  • Provide a standard-based, computable representation of the system behaviors and receiver responsibilities (e.g. WSDL, WSDL-CDL, BPEL)
  • Publish system behavior and receiver responsibilities specifications as a web site (e.g. similar to javadoc) or “book” reports (RTF, PDF, etc.)
    1. Structure & Semantic Design -
    2. Technical & Support Services -
  1. (30 min) Discussion topics
    1. Reaffirmation of V2 XML standard -
    2. Out-of-cycle ballot criteria

Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)

Click for TSC Action Item List