Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT and three year plan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Charliemccay (talk | contribs) (New page: This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay, and has not been reviewed by the TSC or others *Strengths ** Respected membership ** committed membership ** Support from board, HQ, and work...) |
Charliemccay (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
** committed membership | ** committed membership | ||
** Support from board, HQ, and work group members | ** Support from board, HQ, and work group members | ||
+ | ** responsive | ||
*Weakness | *Weakness |
Revision as of 20:44, 6 May 2008
This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay, and has not been reviewed by the TSC or others
- Strengths
- Respected membership
- committed membership
- Support from board, HQ, and work group members
- responsive
- Weakness
- Limited time
- lack of "intermeeting" work
- Limited technical support
- Opportunities
- linkage with roadmap
- Threats
- Loss of initial momentum
- creating overheads without visible return
- alienate key thought leaders
3 year plan
- Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan
- Metrics for good Work Groups, Projects, Products
- Continuous improvement plan
- Communications plan