Difference between revisions of "2012-09-10 DESD WGM Minutes"
MeadWalker (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'See signup sheet for attendance. Agenda 1. Roll call: See signup 2. Review Agenda: accepted as proposed 3. Announcements 4. Updates from the TSC 1. FHIR Governance: TSC is prop…') |
MeadWalker (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See signup sheet for attendance. | See signup sheet for attendance. | ||
| − | Agenda | + | |
| + | ===Agenda=== | ||
| + | |||
1. Roll call: See signup | 1. Roll call: See signup | ||
| − | |||
2. Review Agenda: accepted as proposed | 2. Review Agenda: accepted as proposed | ||
| − | |||
3. Announcements | 3. Announcements | ||
4. Updates from the TSC | 4. Updates from the TSC | ||
| − | + | 5. PBS metrics in DESD | |
| + | 6. Project Scope votes | ||
| + | 7. Mission and Charter votes | ||
| + | 8. Work Group Health Review | ||
| + | 9. Changes to Work Group Health | ||
| + | 10. Co-Chair Elections for January | ||
| + | 11. New Business | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==FHIR Governance:== | ||
TSC is proposing bodies for FHIR governance. There will also be a FHIR management group. There is a request to the steering division for representation on the FHIR management group – weekly conference calls. The set of responsibilities of the management group are listed. | TSC is proposing bodies for FHIR governance. There will also be a FHIR management group. There is a request to the steering division for representation on the FHIR management group – weekly conference calls. The set of responsibilities of the management group are listed. | ||
Suggestion – a major challenge for FHIR is capturing complex clinical content. Expect discussion about the application of the 80/20 rule. Why interested? FHIR is starting, resources are being created. Many of these are from domains we care about. – You have to go with it, or get run over. Is the group going to do the work, or do the coordination? Hugh could volunteer – but through January. Question, does the rep have to be a co-chair? We think not. | Suggestion – a major challenge for FHIR is capturing complex clinical content. Expect discussion about the application of the 80/20 rule. Why interested? FHIR is starting, resources are being created. Many of these are from domains we care about. – You have to go with it, or get run over. Is the group going to do the work, or do the coordination? Hugh could volunteer – but through January. Question, does the rep have to be a co-chair? We think not. | ||
| − | + | ==PBS metrics in DESD== | |
| + | We noted three “best” work groups. The SD is doing well. We have one WG in the red – this is especially worthy of note since the group has not been submitting minutes of working group sessions or conference calls. We have a question about the harmonization requirement on project health – several co-chairs said they never heard about the call. CIC and PHER attended. They are not sure of the value. Comment that sometimes changes are made that have damaging effects – attendance is needed to try to prevent this. Hugh thinks there is a provision for the WG to vote that it determined it did not need to attend. | ||
Note, the requirement for a 3 year plan is to go away, and be replaced by a project health metric. That metric measures open recirculation ballots, unpublished ballots, missing items in project insight, and projects more than 120 days delayed from a published milestone. | Note, the requirement for a 3 year plan is to go away, and be replaced by a project health metric. That metric measures open recirculation ballots, unpublished ballots, missing items in project insight, and projects more than 120 days delayed from a published milestone. | ||
Patient Care says that it should not have any reconciliation ballots for May 2012. There were two ballots that passed, according to the WG. A request to withdraw was sent to the one negative voter. The committee did discuss the vote and stated the negative was not persuasive. PC feels like it has done what it needed to do. Mead says he will ask Karen about this. There are also 4 unpublished ballots listed. These are items that are expected to have a publication request sent to HQ. Finally, the V3 Care Plan Release 1 – passed in 2007. That should be withdrawn. | Patient Care says that it should not have any reconciliation ballots for May 2012. There were two ballots that passed, according to the WG. A request to withdraw was sent to the one negative voter. The committee did discuss the vote and stated the negative was not persuasive. PC feels like it has done what it needed to do. Mead says he will ask Karen about this. There are also 4 unpublished ballots listed. These are items that are expected to have a publication request sent to HQ. Finally, the V3 Care Plan Release 1 – passed in 2007. That should be withdrawn. | ||
| − | + | ==Project Scope votes== | |
| + | No project scopes to review. | ||
| − | + | ==Mission and Charter votes== | |
| + | No missions and charters to review | ||
| − | + | ==Work Group Health Review== | |
| − | + | Discussed | |
| − | + | ==Changes to Work Group Health== | |
3 year plan replaced by overall project health | 3 year plan replaced by overall project health | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Work | + | ==Co-Chair Elections for January == |
| − | Child Health One open | + | Work Groups and Co-Chairs up for Election |
| − | Clinical Genomics Mollie Ullman-Cullere | + | Child Health: One open |
| − | Clinical Interoperability Council Dianne Reeves | + | Clinical Genomics: Mollie Ullman-Cullere |
| − | Patient Safety Ali Rashidee | + | Clinical Interoperability Council: Dianne Reeves |
| − | + | Patient Safety: Ali Rashidee | |
| + | |||
| + | ==New Business== | ||
No new business | No new business | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 2 January 2013
See signup sheet for attendance.
Contents
Agenda
1. Roll call: See signup 2. Review Agenda: accepted as proposed 3. Announcements 4. Updates from the TSC 5. PBS metrics in DESD 6. Project Scope votes 7. Mission and Charter votes 8. Work Group Health Review 9. Changes to Work Group Health 10. Co-Chair Elections for January 11. New Business
FHIR Governance:
TSC is proposing bodies for FHIR governance. There will also be a FHIR management group. There is a request to the steering division for representation on the FHIR management group – weekly conference calls. The set of responsibilities of the management group are listed. Suggestion – a major challenge for FHIR is capturing complex clinical content. Expect discussion about the application of the 80/20 rule. Why interested? FHIR is starting, resources are being created. Many of these are from domains we care about. – You have to go with it, or get run over. Is the group going to do the work, or do the coordination? Hugh could volunteer – but through January. Question, does the rep have to be a co-chair? We think not.
PBS metrics in DESD
We noted three “best” work groups. The SD is doing well. We have one WG in the red – this is especially worthy of note since the group has not been submitting minutes of working group sessions or conference calls. We have a question about the harmonization requirement on project health – several co-chairs said they never heard about the call. CIC and PHER attended. They are not sure of the value. Comment that sometimes changes are made that have damaging effects – attendance is needed to try to prevent this. Hugh thinks there is a provision for the WG to vote that it determined it did not need to attend.
Note, the requirement for a 3 year plan is to go away, and be replaced by a project health metric. That metric measures open recirculation ballots, unpublished ballots, missing items in project insight, and projects more than 120 days delayed from a published milestone. Patient Care says that it should not have any reconciliation ballots for May 2012. There were two ballots that passed, according to the WG. A request to withdraw was sent to the one negative voter. The committee did discuss the vote and stated the negative was not persuasive. PC feels like it has done what it needed to do. Mead says he will ask Karen about this. There are also 4 unpublished ballots listed. These are items that are expected to have a publication request sent to HQ. Finally, the V3 Care Plan Release 1 – passed in 2007. That should be withdrawn.
Project Scope votes
No project scopes to review.
Mission and Charter votes
No missions and charters to review
Work Group Health Review
Discussed
Changes to Work Group Health
3 year plan replaced by overall project health
Co-Chair Elections for January
Work Groups and Co-Chairs up for Election Child Health: One open Clinical Genomics: Mollie Ullman-Cullere Clinical Interoperability Council: Dianne Reeves Patient Safety: Ali Rashidee
New Business
No new business
