Difference between revisions of "2010-03-22 TSC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '{{subst::2010-03-22_TSC_Call_Agenda}}') |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|width="25%"|'''Email Address''' | |width="25%"|'''Email Address''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD||cbeebe@mayo.edu |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD||woody@beelers.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |||Marc Koehn||invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM||marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Austin Kreisler||HL7 DESD||austin.j.kreisler@saic.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting)||HL7 HQ||lynn@hl7.org |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x|| Joginder Madra|| PHER WG ||joginder.madra@gpinformatics.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Ken McCaslin||HL7 TSS SD || Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Charlie McCay (chair)||HL7 TSC Chair||charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x, dorpped off ||Charlie Mead||HL7 ArB||Charlie.mead@booz.com |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |x||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate||Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net | ||
|- | |- | ||
|?||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate||rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca | |?||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate||rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||John Quinn||HL7 CTO||jquinn@hl7.org |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Gregg Seppala||HL7 SSD SD Alternate||gregg.seppala@va.gov |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || || ||. | + | |x||Helen Stevens ||HL7 TSS SD Alternate||helen.stevens@shaw.ca |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || || ||. | + | |x||Ed Tripp||HL7 DESD Alternate||Edward.tripp@estripp.com |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || || ||. | + | |x||D. Mead Walker||HL7 FTSD Alternate||dmead@comcast.net |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | |colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: ''' | + | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: '''yes |
|} | |} | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
| − | #Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) | + | #Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) Joginder on the line to be available for the POIZ DSTU request to publish. |
| − | #Agenda review and approval | + | #Agenda review and approval: move PHER request to top of agenda. Agenda approved by general consent. |
| + | #'''Motion to approve:''' DSTU Publication [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1509/7051/DSTU_Publication_Request_Template_POIZ_R2.doc Request] for PHER - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Immunization, DSTU Release 2 at [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1509 TSC Tracker # 1509]; noted that the 6 month publication time seemed very short. Joginder notes that they want to start the normative process this fall. Negative votes were resolved during reconciliation, he filled out the form incorrectly. All negatives have been resolved and withdrawn. Helen offered a friendly amendment to go 12 months. Joginder thought that would be fine; they want to get all the comments in before the next phase. Helen notes that a DSTU is usually still in effect during a normative development. Material is already being used in Canada so there are already implementations in place. Charlie McCay thinks we should clarify the guidance on that - if DSTU should complete before normative track. Woody also clarifies that negatives do not have to be withdrawn for DSTU; they do not have to be a barrier to approval. Austin clarifies that there are indeed two outstanding negatives. Amendments withdrawn. | ||
| + | #*Motion passes unanimously. Joginder leaves the call. Further discussion on what clarification is asked. Ravi suggests that the negatives retained after reconciliation be attached to the publication requests. Gregg notes that the GOM says the negatives must be addressed, but not necessarily resolved. Perhaps we add language to the form? The form already has "has the work group posted its consideration of all comments received?". Questions on the negative votes should be referred to the reconciliation package. Will the TSC be looking at the reconciliation package with these requests? Helen wants to know if there are contentious issues outstanding. How far does the TSC need to investigate, Woody asks? Helen says if there are correct answers to each item on the form, why do we bother to vote? Charlie McCay suggests we put it on the agenda for the May WGM, DSTU approval process, and move on. | ||
#Approve Minutes from [[2010-03-15_TSC_Call_Minutes]] | #Approve Minutes from [[2010-03-15_TSC_Call_Minutes]] | ||
#Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] – | #Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] – | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 22 March 2010
TSC Agenda/Minutes
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466# |
Date: 2010-03-22 Time: (11:00 am - 12:00 pm U.S. Eastern Time) | ||
| Facilitator | Charlie McCay | Note taker(s) | Lynn Laakso |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | Email Address |
| x | Calvin Beebe | HL7 SSD SD | cbeebe@mayo.edu |
| x | Woody Beeler | HL7 FTSD | woody@beelers.com |
| Marc Koehn | invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM | marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com | |
| x | Austin Kreisler | HL7 DESD | austin.j.kreisler@saic.com |
| x | Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting) | HL7 HQ | lynn@hl7.org |
| x | Joginder Madra | PHER WG | joginder.madra@gpinformatics.com |
| x | Ken McCaslin | HL7 TSS SD | Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com |
| x | Charlie McCay (chair) | HL7 TSC Chair | charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk |
| x, dorpped off | Charlie Mead | HL7 ArB | Charlie.mead@booz.com |
| x | Ravi Natarajan | HL7 Affiliate | Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net |
| ? | Ron Parker | HL7 ArB Alternate | rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca |
| x | John Quinn | HL7 CTO | jquinn@hl7.org |
| x | Gregg Seppala | HL7 SSD SD Alternate | gregg.seppala@va.gov |
| x | Helen Stevens | HL7 TSS SD Alternate | helen.stevens@shaw.ca |
| x | Ed Tripp | HL7 DESD Alternate | Edward.tripp@estripp.com |
| x | D. Mead Walker | HL7 FTSD Alternate | dmead@comcast.net |
| Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: yes | |||
Agenda Topics
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) Joginder on the line to be available for the POIZ DSTU request to publish.
- Agenda review and approval: move PHER request to top of agenda. Agenda approved by general consent.
- Motion to approve: DSTU Publication Request for PHER - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Immunization, DSTU Release 2 at TSC Tracker # 1509; noted that the 6 month publication time seemed very short. Joginder notes that they want to start the normative process this fall. Negative votes were resolved during reconciliation, he filled out the form incorrectly. All negatives have been resolved and withdrawn. Helen offered a friendly amendment to go 12 months. Joginder thought that would be fine; they want to get all the comments in before the next phase. Helen notes that a DSTU is usually still in effect during a normative development. Material is already being used in Canada so there are already implementations in place. Charlie McCay thinks we should clarify the guidance on that - if DSTU should complete before normative track. Woody also clarifies that negatives do not have to be withdrawn for DSTU; they do not have to be a barrier to approval. Austin clarifies that there are indeed two outstanding negatives. Amendments withdrawn.
- Motion passes unanimously. Joginder leaves the call. Further discussion on what clarification is asked. Ravi suggests that the negatives retained after reconciliation be attached to the publication requests. Gregg notes that the GOM says the negatives must be addressed, but not necessarily resolved. Perhaps we add language to the form? The form already has "has the work group posted its consideration of all comments received?". Questions on the negative votes should be referred to the reconciliation package. Will the TSC be looking at the reconciliation package with these requests? Helen wants to know if there are contentious issues outstanding. How far does the TSC need to investigate, Woody asks? Helen says if there are correct answers to each item on the form, why do we bother to vote? Charlie McCay suggests we put it on the agenda for the May WGM, DSTU approval process, and move on.
- Approve Minutes from 2010-03-15_TSC_Call_Minutes
- Review action items –
- CEO Report –
- CTO Report -
- ArB Report –
- Affiliates Report –
- Domain Experts –
- Motion to approve: DSTU Publication Request for PHER - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Immunization, DSTU Release 2 at TSC Tracker # 1509
- Foundation & Technology –
- Structure & Semantic Design –
- Technical & Support Services -
- Potential updates to T3SD Decision Making Practices giving International Mentoring, PIC, and PMO representatives a vote
- Motion to approve: Project Scope Statement for Project Services - Project Visibility project at TSC Tracker # 1477.
- Motion to approve: Project Scope Statement for PIC - First Time Attendee Process Improvement Project at TSC Tracker # 1476.
- WGM Planning
- Discussion Topics:
- By what mechanism/how does HL7 produce white papers? (from 20090922 Tuesday lunch discussion) – several whitepapers projects are in the pipeline and perhaps now is a good time to address?
- Innovations Workshop activity - incubator projects; what is the TSC role?
- What categories or hierarchy does the TSC wish to see in the product list? Need guidance for updates to the Project Scope Statement and display on the website.
- Open Issues List
Supporting Documents
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
