Difference between revisions of "2014-01-15 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == back to TRAC page ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== Category:2014 TSC Minutes {|border="1" cellpad…') |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Melva Peters | + | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff||regrets ||Melva Peters |
|- | |- | ||
| ||John Quinn ||regrets ||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin | | ||John Quinn ||regrets ||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin |
Latest revision as of 15:05, 13 January 2014
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2014-01-15 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Lynn |
Quorum | n/a | ||||
Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
Pat Van Dyke | Rick Haddorff | regrets | Melva Peters | ||
John Quinn | regrets | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | ||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2014-01-08 TRAC
- Action Items:
- Pat will review the GOM to see if the requirement for WGs to meet at each WGM is referenced. If not found, then a recommendation for endorsement by the TSC should be drafted. Lynn will check the cochairs handbook for reference that the WG must meet at each WGM.
- Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
- Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
- Review updated risk spreadsheet
- TSC referred action:
- WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc
- Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Larger sample size, Other measures the TRAC might assess are % of negatives less than 20, or ballots not returned versus negative balloters.
- Discuss outreach to ballot evaluators on what additional ballot quality measures should be performed.
- WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc
- CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Agenda review and approval -
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved