Difference between revisions of "DESD Mission and Charter: Pharmacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the Mission and Charter update for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vot…') |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| − | *Summary - Passed ( | + | *Summary - Passed (8/0/0/4) |
| − | **Number of participants: 9 (Note | + | **Number of participants: 9 (Note one non memeber participant) |
**Most popular option: Affirmative | **Most popular option: Affirmative | ||
| − | **Votes in favor: | + | **Votes in favor: 8 |
**Comments: 4 | **Comments: 4 | ||
**Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0 | **Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0 | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| Tom de Jong (Pharmacy)||OK|||| | | Tom de Jong (Pharmacy)||OK|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Dianne Reeves (CIC) | + | | Dianne Reeves (CIC)||OK|||| |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Count|| | + | | Count||8||0||0 |
|} | |} | ||
*Not a member of DESD see comments below | *Not a member of DESD see comments below | ||
| − | + | ==Comments== | |
| − | ==Comments== | ||
{| {{table}} border=1 | {| {{table}} border=1 | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Name''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Name''' | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 30 December 2011
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the Mission and Charter update for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until 12/28/2011 unless quorum is reached earlier.
Link to Document:
Pharmacy Mission and Charter
- Summary - Passed (8/0/0/4)
- Number of participants: 9 (Note one non memeber participant)
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 8
- Comments: 4
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0
| Co-Chair | Affirmative | Negative | Abstain |
| edwardhelton(NCI) | OK | ||
| KenMcCaslin* | |||
| HelmutKoenig(II) | OK | ||
| Mead Walker (PSWG) | OK | ||
| John Roberts (PHER) | OK | ||
| Jim McKinley (AWG) | OK | ||
| Joy Kuhl (Child Health) | OK | ||
| Tom de Jong (Pharmacy) | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| Count | 8 | 0 | 0 |
*Not a member of DESD see comments below ==Comments==
| Name | Date | Time | Comment |
| Ken McCaslin | Wednesday, December 7, 2011 | 6:54:26 AM GMT-12:00 | You have a number acronyms in your mission/charter. I have no issue with the use of them, provided that the first time they are used they are spelled regardless how common you use them in your language. You are inconsistent, in some cases you do define the acronym. It needs to be done for all including the first time use use WG. Other non-HL7 users may not understand what they represent and reading your mission and charter should not cause further research to be done in order to understand the content. |
| MeadWalker | Monday, December 19, 2011 | 2:50:15 AM GMT-12:00 | While voting affirmative, I would like to align myself with Ken\'s concern. I think spelling out acronyms the first time they appear is an item of good form that all documents of this type should follow. |
| Edward Tripp | Monday, December 19, 2011 | 2:24:02 AM GMT-12:00 | Note: Ken McCaslin is a from another Steering Division so his vote will not count officially. However, his comments are valid and should be addressed. |
| Jim McKinley | Monday, December 19, 2011 | 10:29:00 AM GMT-12:00 | Support comments surrounding acronyms. |
