Difference between revisions of "2009-06-15 TSC Call Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
== Apologies ==
 
== Apologies ==
−
 
+
*Charlie McCay
  
 
=Agenda=
 
=Agenda=
Line 33: Line 33:
 
##Accept Agenda -  
 
##Accept Agenda -  
 
##Approve Minutes from  
 
##Approve Minutes from  
−
##* [[2009-06-01 TSC Call Minutes]]  
+
##* [[2009-06-08 TSC Call Minutes]]  
 
##Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] –  
 
##Review [[TSC_Action_item_list | action items]] –  
 
#'''''(20 min)'' Standing Committee Reports/Approvals'''
 
#'''''(20 min)'' Standing Committee Reports/Approvals'''
 
## CEO Report -  
 
## CEO Report -  
−
## CTO Report -  
+
## CTO Report - In the last week, my activities have been primarily focused in three areas:
 +
###Ed Hammond, Chuck Jaffe and I had several meetings at the offices of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week. We met with John Glaser, Mike Fitzmaurice and Carolyn Bean on Tuesday. We met with Dr. David Blumenthal on Wednesday.<br/>Highlights of what we learned or discussed:
 +
###*The initial “draft” interim regulations on “meaningful use” will be published tomorrow (June 16) for a 30 day public comment period. ONC will then have only thirty days to respond to any comments before sending the regulations on to OMB for publishing in the Federal Register before the end of the year—as required by the ARRA law.
 +
###*All conversations were friendly and productive. Both John and David expressed interest in pursuing the finance plan. However, they first need to get the work of item 'a' above off their desks. When they do get back to us it sounds likely that if they pursue our plan they will want it enclosed in some sort of a contract with HL7. Both, however, were interested if further discussing an arrangement where they participated in HL7 at least at the same level as our other large government provider stakeholders (Canada and the UK).
 +
###I then spent Wednesday afternoon and Thursday at the HITSP face-to-face meetings. The pressure there is quite intense because they are part of the same June 16 related deadline.
 +
###I have completed a draft tooling out-of-budget request to the HL7 Finance Committee. Most of the hard work has been done by the HL7 Tooling Work Group, Publishing Work Group and Jane Curry. The Finance Committee call is in preparation for the Executive Committee Call and then the July Board Conference Call.
 
##* [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=EA_IP EA IP] Update
 
##* [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=EA_IP EA IP] Update
 
## ArB Report -
 
## ArB Report -
 
## Affiliates Report -  
 
## Affiliates Report -  
 
## Domain Experts -  
 
## Domain Experts -  
 +
<!--##*Request to withdraw project - HL7 Version 3 Standard: Specimen; Process Step, Release 1.  See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1062&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 1062]-->
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 
## Foundation & Technology -  
 +
##*Grahame Grieve (MNM) has requested an out-of-cycle ballot of the Data Types R2 material to address a single substantive change arising from the last ballot.  [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/tsc/ballotmanagement/DisplayNIB.cfm?ballot_document_sdo_id=352 Link to Request]
 +
##*Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued)
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -  
 
## Structure & Semantic Design -  
 +
##*EHR WG: Diabetes Data Strategy Project Proposal - [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/1066/726/Diabetes%20Data%20Strategy%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20(2009-06-12).doc Request] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1066&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker 1066]
 +
##*PA WG: Patient Encounters Project Proposal - [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/1067/729/2009-06-15%20(PA)%20PSS%20Patient%20Encounters.doc Request] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1067&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker #1067]
 +
##*PA WG:Real Time Location Tracking Project Proposal - [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/1068/728/2009-06-15%20(PA)%20PSS%20RESS.doc Request] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1068&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker #1068]
 +
##*PA WG: Registry Enhancements for Social Services Project Proposal [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/1069/730/2009-06-15%20(PA)%20PSS%20RTLS.doc Request] at [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1069&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker #1069]
 +
##*CDS WG:
 +
##*SD WG:
 +
##*Registry Enhancements for Social Services Project
 
## Technical & Support Services -   
 
## Technical & Support Services -   
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''  
 
#'''''(30 min)'' Discussion topics'''  
 +
#*Large National Projects - Quinn
 
#*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
 
#*Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
 +
#*Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes.
 +
#**[http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/techNewsletter/HL7_TECHNEWSLETTER_20081125.pdf#page=8 Why do three year plans?]
 +
#** How do we provide linkage and feedback to the Roadmap (and the Roadmap Task Force)?
 +
#*Review and discuss [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=52 Work Group Health documents], and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta
 +
#**Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics.
 
#*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List]
 
#*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/?atid=313&group_id=52&func=browse Open Issues List]
  
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]=
 
=[[TSC Agenda item list| Future Agenda item list]]=
 
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]=
 
=[[TSC Action item list|Click for TSC Action Item List]]=

Latest revision as of 14:55, 15 June 2009

TSC - Technical Steering Committee 

Monday, June 15, 2009 11:00 AM (US Eastern Daylight Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/165215206
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • Chair: Charlie McCay
  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Austin Kreisler (primary), Ed Tripp (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Ravi Natarajan
  • ARB: Charlie Mead (primary), John Koisch (alternate)
  • Ad-Hoc: Jim Case
  • HQ: Lynn Laakso

Invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO)
  • Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Bob Dolin (HL7 Vice Chair)
  • Marc Koehn (EA IP)
  • Karen Van Hentenryck (HQ)

Apologies

  • Charlie McCay

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call -
    2. Accept Agenda -
    3. Approve Minutes from
    4. Review action items –
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report -
    2. CTO Report - In the last week, my activities have been primarily focused in three areas:
      1. Ed Hammond, Chuck Jaffe and I had several meetings at the offices of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week. We met with John Glaser, Mike Fitzmaurice and Carolyn Bean on Tuesday. We met with Dr. David Blumenthal on Wednesday.
        Highlights of what we learned or discussed:
        • The initial “draft” interim regulations on “meaningful use” will be published tomorrow (June 16) for a 30 day public comment period. ONC will then have only thirty days to respond to any comments before sending the regulations on to OMB for publishing in the Federal Register before the end of the year—as required by the ARRA law.
        • All conversations were friendly and productive. Both John and David expressed interest in pursuing the finance plan. However, they first need to get the work of item 'a' above off their desks. When they do get back to us it sounds likely that if they pursue our plan they will want it enclosed in some sort of a contract with HL7. Both, however, were interested if further discussing an arrangement where they participated in HL7 at least at the same level as our other large government provider stakeholders (Canada and the UK).
      2. I then spent Wednesday afternoon and Thursday at the HITSP face-to-face meetings. The pressure there is quite intense because they are part of the same June 16 related deadline.
      3. I have completed a draft tooling out-of-budget request to the HL7 Finance Committee. Most of the hard work has been done by the HL7 Tooling Work Group, Publishing Work Group and Jane Curry. The Finance Committee call is in preparation for the Executive Committee Call and then the July Board Conference Call.
    3. ArB Report -
    4. Affiliates Report -
    5. Domain Experts -
    6. Foundation & Technology -
      • Grahame Grieve (MNM) has requested an out-of-cycle ballot of the Data Types R2 material to address a single substantive change arising from the last ballot. Link to Request
      • Project Insight and GForge cost-benefit analysis (discussion continued)
    7. Structure & Semantic Design -
    8. Technical & Support Services -
  3. (30 min) Discussion topics
    • Large National Projects - Quinn
    • Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - conference call Tuesday June 16
    • Tabled Motion:The TSC provide a structure and format guideline for three year plans to the WGs that describes the content detail required for their own project guidance and decision making processes.
    • Review and discuss Work Group Health documents, and determine a plan to agree what the metrics should be in the spreadsheets, and what we show on the Monday evening cochairs meeting in Atlanta
      • Discussion tabled from last week on whether TSC wishes to produce and provide information on the Work Group health using the current metrics.
    • Open Issues List

Future Agenda item list

Click for TSC Action Item List

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2009-06-15_TSC_Call_Agenda&oldid=5049"