Difference between revisions of "FTSD-WGM-20080505"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
M&M: Lloyd McKenzie | M&M: Lloyd McKenzie | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Jan | + | Jan 29th Minutes approval: 4/0/3 |
| − | * The TSC has asked each committee to provide a Roadmap/Strategic plan detailing what the work group is planning to develop for the next 1-3 years. A three year roadmap would be preferable. | + | * The TSC has asked each committee to provide a Roadmap/Strategic plan detailing what the work group is planning to develop for the next 1-3 years. A three-year roadmap would be preferable. The detail is intended to be minimal and plan is intended to be reviewed and revised yearly. |
* Additionally, the work groups have been asked to provide a brief SWOT analysis of their group. | * Additionally, the work groups have been asked to provide a brief SWOT analysis of their group. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 13 May 2008
Draft WGM Minutes
Attendees
Implementation : Jennifer Puyenbroek , Jason Rock, Frank Oemig ITS: Paul Knapp SOA: Ken Rubin, John Koisch, INM: Grahame Grieve, Scott Robinson, Vocab: Russ Hamm, Ted Klein Security: Bernd Bloebel Templates: Galen Mulrooney Java: none M&M: Lloyd McKenzie
Jan 29th Minutes approval: 4/0/3
- The TSC has asked each committee to provide a Roadmap/Strategic plan detailing what the work group is planning to develop for the next 1-3 years. A three-year roadmap would be preferable. The detail is intended to be minimal and plan is intended to be reviewed and revised yearly.
- Additionally, the work groups have been asked to provide a brief SWOT analysis of their group.
ARB has a project to look at re-organizing committees and responsibility for different topics. Begin with data-collection about personal and committee interests and then hopefully evolve to agreed list of potential changes (or perhaps agreement that no changes are necessary).
Motion:#050508-01
The committee endorse the idea of exploring reorganization committees and/or their responsibilities and artifacts. Lloyd/Jennifer 7/0/0
Motion:#050508-02
Dynamic Model Framework project scope statement reviewed but the participants requested more time to review the proposal. The attendees felt that they did not have sufficient information to make a decision.
Motion to table approval decision on project scope statement to next conference call: Ken, Bernd 5/0/2
---
