Difference between revisions of "2010-03-15 TSC Call Minutes"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{subst::2010-03-15_TSC_Call_Agenda}}')
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==TSC Minutes - see original at [[Meeting Minutes template]]==
+
==TSC Minutes ==
−
 
+
[[category:2010 TSC Minutes]]
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
| width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
| width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|regrets||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD||cbeebe@mayo.edu
 
|regrets||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD||cbeebe@mayo.edu
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD||woody@beelers.com
+
|x||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD||woody@beelers.com
 
|-
 
|-
 
|?||Marc Koehn||invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM||marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com
 
|?||Marc Koehn||invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM||marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Austin Kreisler||HL7 DESD||austin.j.kreisler@saic.com
+
|x||Austin Kreisler||HL7 DESD||austin.j.kreisler@saic.com
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting)||HL7 HQ||lynn@hl7.org
+
|x||Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting)||HL7 HQ||lynn@hl7.org
 
|-
 
|-
 
|regrets||Ken McCaslin||HL7 TSS SD || Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com
 
|regrets||Ken McCaslin||HL7 TSS SD || Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Charlie McCay (chair)||HL7 TSC Chair||charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk
+
|x||Charlie McCay (chair)||HL7 TSC Chair||charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Charlie Mead||HL7 ArB||Charlie.mead@booz.com
+
|x||Charlie Mead||HL7 ArB||Charlie.mead@booz.com
 
|-
 
|-
 
|?||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate||Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net
 
|?||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate||Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate||rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca
+
|||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate||rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||John Quinn||HL7 CTO||jquinn@hl7.org
+
|x||John Quinn||HL7 CTO||jquinn@hl7.org
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Gregg Seppala||HL7 SSD SD Alternate||gregg.seppala@va.gov
+
|x||Gregg Seppala||HL7 SSD SD Alternate||gregg.seppala@va.gov
 
|-
 
|-
 
|?||Helen Stevens ||HL7 TSS SD Alternate||helen.stevens@shaw.ca
 
|?||Helen Stevens ||HL7 TSS SD Alternate||helen.stevens@shaw.ca
 
|-
 
|-
−
|?||Ed Tripp||HL7 DESD Alternate||Edward.tripp@estripp.com
+
|x||Ed Tripp||HL7 DESD Alternate||Edward.tripp@estripp.com
 
|-
 
|-
 
|?||D. Mead Walker||HL7 FTSD Alternate||dmead@comcast.net
 
|?||D. Mead Walker||HL7 FTSD Alternate||dmead@comcast.net
−
|-
 
−
| || || ||.
 
−
|-
 
−
| || || ||.
 
−
|-
 
−
| || || ||.
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: '''(yes/No)
+
|colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: '''yes
−
|-
+
|}
−
| colspan="4" |'''Agenda Topics''' <br/>
+
 
 +
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/>
 
#Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
 
#Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
 
#Agenda review and approval  
 
#Agenda review and approval  
Line 78: Line 73:
 
#*Discuss Ken Rubin's suggestion to have the Project proponent (co-chair or project lead) attend the TSC to discuss/defend the scope statement, with the expectation that "minor" changes can be agreed on-the-spot without a cycle-back to the Steering Divisions.
 
#*Discuss Ken Rubin's suggestion to have the Project proponent (co-chair or project lead) attend the TSC to discuss/defend the scope statement, with the expectation that "minor" changes can be agreed on-the-spot without a cycle-back to the Steering Divisions.
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=313 Open Issues List]
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=313 Open Issues List]
−
|-
+
 
−
|colspan="4" |'''Supporting Documents'''<br/>
+
'''Supporting Documents'''<br/>
−
<!--
+
 
−
#
+
 
−
-->
+
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
−
|-
+
#Visitors:none; though expected someone from Mitre on ITS project
−
|colspan="4" |'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
+
#Agenda: approved by general consent
−
<!--
+
#[[2010-03-08_TSC_Call_Minutes]] approved by general consent
−
#Visitors:
+
#Action items: approval of Ballot Items list
−
#Agenda:
+
#*Informative ballots: Changes to the CDS informative ballot projects; informative ballots for CDS had name changes amended. Informative ballots approved unanimously. 
−
#Minutes approved by general consent
+
#*DSTU Ballots: DSTU Ballots discussed, regarding Security DAM as DSTU (on Normative track). Amended to approve as Informative for now and allow them to come back with justification.
−
#CEO
+
#**'''''Vote:''''' DSTU ballots as amended approved unanimously.
−
#CTO
+
#*Normative Ballots: question on Medication CMETs actually under Pharmacy Work Group, listed as Project 249 with Pharmacy CMETs but ballot request is under Orders and Observations.  This was clarified by during-call confirmations with Hugh Glover and Don Lloyd.
−
#ArB
+
#**'''''Vote:''''' Normative ballot content approved unanimously.
−
#Affiliates:
+
#*Alternate Ballot open dates: alternate open date for CDA R2 Implementation guides becoming prevalent. This allows 30 days and no more, but the cushion is for post-processing for ballot site preparation. It would make it simpler if all ballots could open at once and close at once. Do we ask Publishing to deal with it?  See if they can identify an alternative solution. Recommendation carried by unanimous consent.
−
#DESD
+
#**'''''Vote: '''''Alternate ballot open dates approved unanimously.
−
#FTSD
+
#*Continuing Normative ballots: not requiring TSC approval. Open ballot pool approved.
−
#SSD SD
+
#*'''''Vote: ''''' For Comment Only ballots: IDMP ballot approved unanimously.
−
#T3SD
+
#CEO report - none
 +
#CTO report - heading to Barcelona today; Chuck and Bob already there. Committee meeting on Thursday. NIEM and process to replace HITSP are of concern.
 +
#ArB - all four frameworks ready to go to peer review. Two topics of interest, this past meeting ECCF, BF and GF ready to go, and SAIF Intro.  The Information Framework is taking shape but not ready to go yet. Ann Wrightson has provided some input that Cecil and he are trying to incorporate. ArB and especially Cecil reviewed Privacy and Security service project and are supporting it.
 +
#*No further alpha project charters available; need to check with Marc.
 +
#Affiliates: no report
 +
#DESD - one project approval in process this morning.
 +
#FTSD - Gerald Beuchelt from Mitre now identifies himself to offer resolution to questions. The word Messages in line 2 of section 4 in project scope to 'payloads'. There will be a subsequent clarification in May as to what will be balloted in September. Current project is for the research phase, with expectation that a new scope statement will be advanced for the balloted material. 
 +
#* '''''Vote: ''''' unanimously approved as amended.
 +
#*Small support group has been formed to support John's queries on NIEM.
 +
#SSD SD - Gregg reports no activity this past week.
 +
#T3SD - no representative.
 
#WGM:
 
#WGM:
−
#Organizational Relations committee update:
+
#*WGM information wiki page on HL7 Wiki at http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=WGM_information.
 +
#*Austin notes that one DESD WG noted that the 'leisure' destination for this meeting and the travel cost are discouraging many typical attendees from even trying to request the permission to attend.
 
#Discussion
 
#Discussion
−
#Adjourned hh:mm am/pm (timezone).
+
#*Discuss Ken Rubin's suggestion to have the Project proponent (co-chair or project lead) attend the TSC to discuss/defend the scope statement, with the expectation that "minor" changes can be agreed on-the-spot without a cycle-back to the Steering Divisions.
−
-->
+
#*Don't want to make it a requirement, but a proactive and directed request. Ed suggests is it a problem that if there are questions we table it a week and invite the project reps back to discuss.  Let's draft some verbage to address to communicate the process to the membership.
 +
#Adjourned 12:02 pm EDT.
 +
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
−
* .
+
* Lynn to draft process on project facilitators should be aware of for being present on conference calls to address any issues.  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>

Latest revision as of 14:05, 4 June 2010

TSC Minutes

HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466#
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206

Date: 2010-03-15
Time: (11:00 am - 12:00 pm U.S. Eastern Time)
Facilitator Charlie McCay Note taker(s) Lynn Laakso
Attendee Name Affiliation Email Address
regrets Calvin Beebe HL7 SSD SD cbeebe@mayo.edu
x Woody Beeler HL7 FTSD woody@beelers.com
? Marc Koehn invited Guest, HL7 EA IP PM marc.koehn@gpinformatics.com
x Austin Kreisler HL7 DESD austin.j.kreisler@saic.com
x Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting) HL7 HQ lynn@hl7.org
regrets Ken McCaslin HL7 TSS SD Kenneth.H.McCaslin@QuestDiagnostics.com
x Charlie McCay (chair) HL7 TSC Chair charlie@ramseysystems.co.uk
x Charlie Mead HL7 ArB Charlie.mead@booz.com
? Ravi Natarajan HL7 Affiliate Ravi.Natarajan@nhs.net
Ron Parker HL7 ArB Alternate rparker@infoway-inforoute.ca
x John Quinn HL7 CTO jquinn@hl7.org
x Gregg Seppala HL7 SSD SD Alternate gregg.seppala@va.gov
? Helen Stevens HL7 TSS SD Alternate helen.stevens@shaw.ca
x Ed Tripp HL7 DESD Alternate Edward.tripp@estripp.com
? D. Mead Walker HL7 FTSD Alternate dmead@comcast.net
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: yes

Agenda Topics

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval
  3. Approve Minutes from 2010-03-08_TSC_Call_Minutes
  4. Review action items –
  5. CEO Report –
  6. CTO Report -
  7. ArB Report –
  8. Affiliates Report –
  9. Domain Experts –
  10. Foundation & Technology –
  11. Structure & Semantic Design –
  12. Technical & Support Services -
  13. WGM Planning
  14. Discussion Topics:
    • Discuss Ken Rubin's suggestion to have the Project proponent (co-chair or project lead) attend the TSC to discuss/defend the scope statement, with the expectation that "minor" changes can be agreed on-the-spot without a cycle-back to the Steering Divisions.
    • Open Issues List

Supporting Documents


Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. Visitors:none; though expected someone from Mitre on ITS project
  2. Agenda: approved by general consent
  3. 2010-03-08_TSC_Call_Minutes approved by general consent
  4. Action items: approval of Ballot Items list
    • Informative ballots: Changes to the CDS informative ballot projects; informative ballots for CDS had name changes amended. Informative ballots approved unanimously.
    • DSTU Ballots: DSTU Ballots discussed, regarding Security DAM as DSTU (on Normative track). Amended to approve as Informative for now and allow them to come back with justification.
      • Vote: DSTU ballots as amended approved unanimously.
    • Normative Ballots: question on Medication CMETs actually under Pharmacy Work Group, listed as Project 249 with Pharmacy CMETs but ballot request is under Orders and Observations. This was clarified by during-call confirmations with Hugh Glover and Don Lloyd.
      • Vote: Normative ballot content approved unanimously.
    • Alternate Ballot open dates: alternate open date for CDA R2 Implementation guides becoming prevalent. This allows 30 days and no more, but the cushion is for post-processing for ballot site preparation. It would make it simpler if all ballots could open at once and close at once. Do we ask Publishing to deal with it? See if they can identify an alternative solution. Recommendation carried by unanimous consent.
      • Vote: Alternate ballot open dates approved unanimously.
    • Continuing Normative ballots: not requiring TSC approval. Open ballot pool approved.
    • Vote: For Comment Only ballots: IDMP ballot approved unanimously.
  5. CEO report - none
  6. CTO report - heading to Barcelona today; Chuck and Bob already there. Committee meeting on Thursday. NIEM and process to replace HITSP are of concern.
  7. ArB - all four frameworks ready to go to peer review. Two topics of interest, this past meeting ECCF, BF and GF ready to go, and SAIF Intro. The Information Framework is taking shape but not ready to go yet. Ann Wrightson has provided some input that Cecil and he are trying to incorporate. ArB and especially Cecil reviewed Privacy and Security service project and are supporting it.
    • No further alpha project charters available; need to check with Marc.
  8. Affiliates: no report
  9. DESD - one project approval in process this morning.
  10. FTSD - Gerald Beuchelt from Mitre now identifies himself to offer resolution to questions. The word Messages in line 2 of section 4 in project scope to 'payloads'. There will be a subsequent clarification in May as to what will be balloted in September. Current project is for the research phase, with expectation that a new scope statement will be advanced for the balloted material.
    • Vote: unanimously approved as amended.
    • Small support group has been formed to support John's queries on NIEM.
  11. SSD SD - Gregg reports no activity this past week.
  12. T3SD - no representative.
  13. WGM:
    • WGM information wiki page on HL7 Wiki at http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=WGM_information.
    • Austin notes that one DESD WG noted that the 'leisure' destination for this meeting and the travel cost are discouraging many typical attendees from even trying to request the permission to attend.
  14. Discussion
    • Discuss Ken Rubin's suggestion to have the Project proponent (co-chair or project lead) attend the TSC to discuss/defend the scope statement, with the expectation that "minor" changes can be agreed on-the-spot without a cycle-back to the Steering Divisions.
    • Don't want to make it a requirement, but a proactive and directed request. Ed suggests is it a problem that if there are questions we table it a week and invite the project reps back to discuss. Let's draft some verbage to address to communicate the process to the membership.
  15. Adjourned 12:02 pm EDT.
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Lynn to draft process on project facilitators should be aware of for being present on conference calls to address any issues.
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .

Future Agenda item list

Click for TSC Action Item List

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2010-03-15_TSC_Call_Minutes&oldid=6520"