Difference between revisions of "FTSD-F2F-20090112"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: =Foundation and Technology Steering Division Workgroup Meeting= FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division ==Attendees== *Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS) ** Dale Nelso...)
 
Line 36: Line 36:
 
<p>2. ''10 min''Announcement: Work Group Health - spreadsheet
 
<p>2. ''10 min''Announcement: Work Group Health - spreadsheet
 
Ff the information in the spreadsheet is correct, then work groups that received a score of 5 or greater may need to investigate the root cause and let the SD know if there are any issues. Typically, our work groups appear to be working productively.</p>
 
Ff the information in the spreadsheet is correct, then work groups that received a score of 5 or greater may need to investigate the root cause and let the SD know if there are any issues. Typically, our work groups appear to be working productively.</p>
−
<p>3.''10 min'' Announcement: </p>
+
<p>3.''10 min'' Announcement: SWOT and Three-year planning: The TSC is looking for each committee to provide a SWOT analysis and a Three-year planning spreadsheet identifying the major projects and their milestones. Lynn Laakso has aligned the projects in the SD with to an objective in the HL7 Roadmap. We need to look at those project that are not aligned with a roadmap objective. Either the roadmap is incomplete or the project is not in the roadmap.</p>
−
<p>5.''(10 min)'' '''InM Work Group Mission Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/267/InM%20mission%20and%20Charter%20Revision.zip InM Mission Charter Change]- withdrawn, returned to WG</p>
+
 
−
Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: <br/>Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.
+
 
−
<p>6. (7.5 min) '''Scope issues ''' (Jason Rock)</p>
 
−
<ul>
 
−
<li>
 
−
Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s).
 
−
Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0
 
−
<ul>
 
−
<li>We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.</li>
 
−
<li>We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.</li>
 
−
<li>The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.</li>
 
−
<li>RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.</li>
 
−
</ul>
 
−
</li>
 
  
 
<p>7. (5 min) ''' Core Principles Doc''' (Ted Klein) witdrawn</p>
 
<p>7. (5 min) ''' Core Principles Doc''' (Ted Klein) witdrawn</p>

Revision as of 00:52, 13 January 2009

Foundation and Technology Steering Division Workgroup Meeting

FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division

Attendees

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
    • Dale Nelson
    • Paul Knapp
    • Charlie McCay
  • Implementation/Conformance
    • Jason Rock
    • Jenni Puyenbroek
    • Frank Oemig
    • Dick Harding
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
    • Graham Grieve
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
    • Ioana Singureanu
    • Lloyd McKenzie
    • Woody Beeler
  • Security
    • Mike Davis
    • Bernd Blobel
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • Ken Rubin
    • Juha Mykkanen
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary
    • Ted Klein
    • Beverly Knight

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call

2. (05 min) Approve Minutes Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0

2. 10 minAnnouncement: Work Group Health - spreadsheet Ff the information in the spreadsheet is correct, then work groups that received a score of 5 or greater may need to investigate the root cause and let the SD know if there are any issues. Typically, our work groups appear to be working productively.

3.10 min Announcement: SWOT and Three-year planning: The TSC is looking for each committee to provide a SWOT analysis and a Three-year planning spreadsheet identifying the major projects and their milestones. Lynn Laakso has aligned the projects in the SD with to an objective in the HL7 Roadmap. We need to look at those project that are not aligned with a roadmap objective. Either the roadmap is incomplete or the project is not in the roadmap.


7. (5 min) Core Principles Doc (Ted Klein) witdrawn

There is a question regarding reballoting "Core Principles" but Vocab is not willing to proceed with the Jan ballot due to the large number of comments. There may not be enough time to address the large number of substantive vocab comments.

  • If any issues are raised across WGs in the SD, should they be raised to the SD?

8. (10 min) SAEAF Discussion (Charlie McCay)

SD to endorse the distribution of the following candidate documents not later than two weeks prior to the January WGM:

  • Plan documenting the acceptance and review process of the SAEAF.
  • Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
  • The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.

Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler 17-0-1

9.(5 min) Other Business

All the WG in the SD should reserve Q3-Q4, Wed for a discussion of the SAEAF.



Agenda items

Action Item List

Back to Meetings

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=FTSD-F2F-20090112&oldid=4225"