Difference between revisions of "SSDMeeting2007 11 12"
Calvinbeebe (talk | contribs) (New page: <p><center>SSD Steering Group</center></p> <center><small>Minutes of Nov 12, 2007</small></center> <table> <tr><th>Name</th><th>Organization</th><th>E-Mail</th><th>TC</th></tr> <tr><td>Ha...) |
Calvinbeebe (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <p><center>SSD Steering Group</center></p> | + | <p><center><big><b>SSD Steering Group</b></big></center></p> |
<center><small>Minutes of Nov 12, 2007</small></center> | <center><small>Minutes of Nov 12, 2007</small></center> | ||
| − | + | <p></p> | |
<table> | <table> | ||
| − | <tr><th>Name</th><th>Organization</th><th>E-Mail</th><th>TC</th></tr> | + | <tr><th width=15%>Name</th><th width=37%>Organization</th><th width=38%>E-Mail</th><th width=10%>TC</th></tr> |
<tr><td>Hans Buitendijk</td><td>Siemens</td><td>hans.buitendijk@siemens.com</td><td>OO</td></tr> | <tr><td>Hans Buitendijk</td><td>Siemens</td><td>hans.buitendijk@siemens.com</td><td>OO</td></tr> | ||
<tr><td>John Ritter</td><td>Intel Corporation, Digital Health Group</td><td>john.ritter@intel.com</td><td>EHR</td></tr> | <tr><td>John Ritter</td><td>Intel Corporation, Digital Health Group</td><td>john.ritter@intel.com</td><td>EHR</td></tr> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<tr><td>Calvin Beebe</td><td>Mayo Clinic</td><td>cbeebe@mayo.edu</td><td>SD</td></tr> | <tr><td>Calvin Beebe</td><td>Mayo Clinic</td><td>cbeebe@mayo.edu</td><td>SD</td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| + | <p></p> | ||
| + | ===Agenda:=== | ||
| − | + | ====The Laboratory Orders IG project proposal:==== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Based on most current conversations to clarify the scope and intent, the | Based on most current conversations to clarify the scope and intent, the | ||
attached document reflects the most current proposed Project Statement | attached document reflects the most current proposed Project Statement | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Design SD for approval to enable us to formally start this project. | Design SD for approval to enable us to formally start this project. | ||
| − | + | ===== Laboratory Implementation Guide Project (Orders IG) ===== | |
Minutes: | Minutes: | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Motion - Move that the SSD accepts the Project statement for the IG AS submits HANS. | Motion - Move that the SSD accepts the Project statement for the IG AS submits HANS. | ||
CDS (Mat Sailors) seconded. | CDS (Mat Sailors) seconded. | ||
| − | Vote: For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed | + | <p><b>Vote: For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed</b></p> |
Ken dropped off the call. | Ken dropped off the call. | ||
| − | + | ====Two project proposals were submitted by the EHR TC:==== | |
As required by the new HL7 process, attached are two project scope statements for upcoming EHR TC ballots. Both are long-standing projects which have been reviewed extensively within the EHR TC. Item 2 was developed in collaboration with the Structured Documents TC with input from the Security TC. | As required by the new HL7 process, attached are two project scope statements for upcoming EHR TC ballots. Both are long-standing projects which have been reviewed extensively within the EHR TC. Item 2 was developed in collaboration with the Structured Documents TC with input from the Security TC. | ||
| − | + | ===== Electronic Health Record Lifecycle Model (EHR/LM)DTSU ===== | |
Hans - requested a slight revision of the proposal to indicate the interoperability aspects of the project. Revisions were accepted as a friendly amendment. | Hans - requested a slight revision of the proposal to indicate the interoperability aspects of the project. Revisions were accepted as a friendly amendment. | ||
Motion: Request that SSD accepts the amended Electronic Health Record Lifecycle Model project proposal. Second from Hans | Motion: Request that SSD accepts the amended Electronic Health Record Lifecycle Model project proposal. Second from Hans | ||
| − | Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed | + | <p><b>Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed</b></p> |
| − | + | ===== CDA Release 2 Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability ===== | |
| − | |||
Motion: made by John Ritter, requests acceptance by SSD of the CDA Release 2 Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability. After some discussion and a minor amendment, it received a second - Hans | Motion: made by John Ritter, requests acceptance by SSD of the CDA Release 2 Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability. After some discussion and a minor amendment, it received a second - Hans | ||
| − | Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed | + | <p><b>Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed</b></p> |
Latest revision as of 15:00, 28 November 2007
| Name | Organization | TC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hans Buitendijk | Siemens | hans.buitendijk@siemens.com | OO |
| John Ritter | Intel Corporation, Digital Health Group | john.ritter@intel.com | EHR |
| Seppala, Gregg | VA | Gregg.Seppala@va.gov | PA |
| R. Matthew Sailors | The Methodist Hospital | msailors@tmhs.org | CDS, Arden |
| Susan Lepping | Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services | susan.lepping@siemens.com | FM |
| Kenneth McCaslin | Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated | kenneth.h.mccaslin@questdiagnostics.com | LAB |
| Calvin Beebe | Mayo Clinic | cbeebe@mayo.edu | SD |
Contents
Agenda:
The Laboratory Orders IG project proposal:
Based on most current conversations to clarify the scope and intent, the attached document reflects the most current proposed Project Statement for the Order Management Laboratory Order to Laboratory Implementation Guide Project. This will be presented to the Structured and Semantic Design SD for approval to enable us to formally start this project.
Laboratory Implementation Guide Project (Orders IG)
Minutes: We currently have two results oriented guides; one supporting lab results for EHR and the other for Elinks, both are for results messages. This project is for an Order implementation guide that correlates with what is needed for the orders side and compliments the previous guides developed for resulting.
Motion - Move that the SSD accepts the Project statement for the IG AS submits HANS. CDS (Mat Sailors) seconded.
Vote: For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed
Ken dropped off the call.
Two project proposals were submitted by the EHR TC:
As required by the new HL7 process, attached are two project scope statements for upcoming EHR TC ballots. Both are long-standing projects which have been reviewed extensively within the EHR TC. Item 2 was developed in collaboration with the Structured Documents TC with input from the Security TC.
Electronic Health Record Lifecycle Model (EHR/LM)DTSU
Hans - requested a slight revision of the proposal to indicate the interoperability aspects of the project. Revisions were accepted as a friendly amendment. Motion: Request that SSD accepts the amended Electronic Health Record Lifecycle Model project proposal. Second from Hans
Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed
CDA Release 2 Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability
Motion: made by John Ritter, requests acceptance by SSD of the CDA Release 2 Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability. After some discussion and a minor amendment, it received a second - Hans
Vote - For – 5, Against – 0, Abstaining – 0 Motion Passed
