Difference between revisions of "FaceToFace-20070111"
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Parker, Beeler, Blobel, Buitendijk, Case, McCay, McCaslin, Hall | Parker, Beeler, Blobel, Buitendijk, Case, McCay, McCaslin, Hall | ||
| − | = | + | =Adopted Agenda= |
:Process Discussion with Frieda and Ken | :Process Discussion with Frieda and Ken | ||
:Involving key groups and individuals. | :Involving key groups and individuals. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin= | =Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin= | ||
| − | + | Group's remit ends shortly after Transition ends. | |
Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall) | Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall) | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard. | Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard. | ||
| − | T3F will need to assign steps in new structure to assure Life Cycle is | + | T3F will need to assign steps in new structure to assure Life Cycle is alive and workable in new structure, including roles of TD, Technical Committees and relationship of TD to successor to the Project Life Cycle effort. |
T3F will designate Jim Case as point person to Project Life Cycle | T3F will designate Jim Case as point person to Project Life Cycle | ||
| − | Suggest that final proposal for the process be Life Cycle team, final proposal on responsibilities for the steps and maintenance of life cycle be in T3F documents | + | Suggest that the final proposal for the process be Life Cycle team documents, and the final proposal on responsibilities for the steps and maintenance of life cycle be in T3F documents |
==Questions to ToT== | ==Questions to ToT== | ||
| − | Is Strategic Initiative Document being Maintained? (Needs to be updated by each team as it progresses.) How does ToT remain aware of what each team is doing? | + | Is Strategic Initiative Document being Maintained? (Needs to be updated by each team as it progresses.) How does ToT remain aware of what each team is doing? |
| − | =Outreach to | + | =Outreach and Participation= |
| + | |||
| + | Hl7 Board appointed Virginia Lorenzi to fill the open slot. Logistics and timing prevented Virginia from attending this meeting, but the T3F looks forward to her participation | ||
| + | |||
| + | Groups for T3F Direct Liaison - with designated contact: | ||
*Project Life Cycle - Case | *Project Life Cycle - Case | ||
*Transition Oversight - Buitendijk | *Transition Oversight - Buitendijk | ||
| Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
*ARB - Parker | *ARB - Parker | ||
| − | + | T3F will provide a standing invitation to the Chair(s) (or their designee) to attend T3F Meetings (Beeler to do) | |
=Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs= | =Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs= | ||
| − | Sunday night joint | + | Sunday night joint session |
| − | 7AM -8AM | + | T3F Face-toface meetings 7AM -8AM Tuesday and Thursday |
| − | Open Mike session - | + | Open Mike session - We will ask Linda how we might get a flexible locale either at breaks or one evening |
| + | |||
| + | Craig Parker agreed to follow up with HQ on these. | ||
=Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists= | =Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists= | ||
| − | GotoMeeting plus HL7 | + | GotoMeeting plus HL7 Conference Call service (Beeler) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | T3F Internal list | + | Three HL7-supported mail lists (Parker): |
| + | *Mail List "to" T3F members | ||
| + | *T3F Public list | ||
| + | *T3F Internal list | ||
=Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)= | =Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)= | ||
| + | No. Full group not available | ||
| − | + | =Remaining topics deferred for lack of time, included= | |
| − | + | :Focus on the Agenda Topic List | |
| − | + | =Agenda topic list (being built, suggest items)= | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | =Agenda topic list= | ||
:Core challenges. Each with | :Core challenges. Each with | ||
::Success Criteria and Time box | ::Success Criteria and Time box | ||
Latest revision as of 18:00, 11 January 2007
Contents
- 1 Present
- 2 Adopted Agenda
- 3 Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin
- 4 Outreach and Participation
- 5 Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs
- 6 Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists
- 7 Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)
- 8 Remaining topics deferred for lack of time, included
- 9 Agenda topic list (being built, suggest items)
- 10 Action item list
Present
Parker, Beeler, Blobel, Buitendijk, Case, McCay, McCaslin, Hall
Adopted Agenda
- Process Discussion with Frieda and Ken
- Involving key groups and individuals.
- Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs
- Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists
- Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)
- Focus on the Agenda Topic List
Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin
Group's remit ends shortly after Transition ends.
Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall)
Sought peer review. No interest until announcements last week. Is now, and Peer Review closes Feb 15
Suggesting "project Facilitator" in each Committee
Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard.
T3F will need to assign steps in new structure to assure Life Cycle is alive and workable in new structure, including roles of TD, Technical Committees and relationship of TD to successor to the Project Life Cycle effort.
T3F will designate Jim Case as point person to Project Life Cycle
Suggest that the final proposal for the process be Life Cycle team documents, and the final proposal on responsibilities for the steps and maintenance of life cycle be in T3F documents
Questions to ToT
Is Strategic Initiative Document being Maintained? (Needs to be updated by each team as it progresses.) How does ToT remain aware of what each team is doing?
Outreach and Participation
Hl7 Board appointed Virginia Lorenzi to fill the open slot. Logistics and timing prevented Virginia from attending this meeting, but the T3F looks forward to her participation
Groups for T3F Direct Liaison - with designated contact:
- Project Life Cycle - Case
- Transition Oversight - Buitendijk
- TSC - McCay
- ARB - Parker
T3F will provide a standing invitation to the Chair(s) (or their designee) to attend T3F Meetings (Beeler to do)
Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs
Sunday night joint session
T3F Face-toface meetings 7AM -8AM Tuesday and Thursday
Open Mike session - We will ask Linda how we might get a flexible locale either at breaks or one evening
Craig Parker agreed to follow up with HQ on these.
Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists
GotoMeeting plus HL7 Conference Call service (Beeler)
Three HL7-supported mail lists (Parker):
- Mail List "to" T3F members
- T3F Public list
- T3F Internal list
Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)
No. Full group not available
Remaining topics deferred for lack of time, included
- Focus on the Agenda Topic List
Agenda topic list (being built, suggest items)
- Core challenges. Each with
- Success Criteria and Time box
- Communications strategy
Action item list
- Refine the steps from minutes of 20070104 into action items
- Classify and propose actions on items in document trove
- Assemble agenda topic list
