Difference between revisions of "FaceToFace-20070111"
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Present= | =Present= | ||
| − | Beeler, Blobel, | + | Parker, Beeler, Blobel, Buitendyck, Case, McCay, McCaslin, Hall |
=Preliminary Agenda= | =Preliminary Agenda= | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Focus on the Agenda Topic List | :Focus on the Agenda Topic List | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin= | =Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin= | ||
Groups remit ends shortly after Transition ends. | Groups remit ends shortly after Transition ends. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall) | Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall) | ||
| Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard. | Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard. | ||
| + | |||
| + | T3F will need to assign steps in new structure to assure Life Cycle is alove and workable in new structure, including roles of TD, Technical Committees and relationship of TD to successor to the Project Life Cycle effort. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Questions to ToT== | ||
| + | Is Strategic Initiative Document being Maintained? (Needs to be updated by each team as it progresses.) How does ToT remain aware of what each team is doing? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
=Agenda topic list= | =Agenda topic list= | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 11 January 2007
Contents
Present
Parker, Beeler, Blobel, Buitendyck, Case, McCay, McCaslin, Hall
Preliminary Agenda
- Process Discussion with Frieda and Ken
- Proposed Item (Craig/Charlie): Involving key groups and individuals.
- Finalize Koln WGM space/time needs
- Logistics - Meeting support and technology & e-mail lists
- Proposed Item (Craig): Meeting in conjunction with Harmonization (March 13-16 in Las Vegas)
- Focus on the Agenda Topic List
Project Life Cycle Team Discussion - Hall, McCaslin
Groups remit ends shortly after Transition ends.
Key features - have a process but must be iterative (not waterfall)
Sought peer review. No interest until announcements last week. Is now, and Peer Review closes Feb 15
Suggesting "project Facilitator" in each Committee
Results of a project will be used, and for standards ultimate focus is a normative standard.
T3F will need to assign steps in new structure to assure Life Cycle is alove and workable in new structure, including roles of TD, Technical Committees and relationship of TD to successor to the Project Life Cycle effort.
Questions to ToT
Is Strategic Initiative Document being Maintained? (Needs to be updated by each team as it progresses.) How does ToT remain aware of what each team is doing?
Agenda topic list
- Core challenges. Each with
- Success Criteria and Time box
- Communications strategy
Action item list
- Refine the steps from minutes of 20070104 into action items
- Classify and propose actions on items in document trove
- Assemble agenda topic list
