Difference between revisions of "ConferenceCall-200704"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) (→Steps) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
# Starting with the Current "HDF", and the SI Documents identify the '''SIX''' (not more) features/objectives of the HL7 "Architecture" (e.g. "reuse common models") | # Starting with the Current "HDF", and the SI Documents identify the '''SIX''' (not more) features/objectives of the HL7 "Architecture" (e.g. "reuse common models") | ||
# Work through the SI documents to identify issues and strategies that prevent achieving these objectives, and/or facilitate achieving them | # Work through the SI documents to identify issues and strategies that prevent achieving these objectives, and/or facilitate achieving them | ||
| − | # | + | # Outline a standards development process that can realize deliverables that meet these objectives. |
# Identify principles under which Committees are formed and differentiated, including inter-committee conflict and provide a resolution therefore. | # Identify principles under which Committees are formed and differentiated, including inter-committee conflict and provide a resolution therefore. | ||
# Create a white paper for review by Board and TSC about this | # Create a white paper for review by Board and TSC about this | ||
| + | |||
==Reconcile Other Documents== | ==Reconcile Other Documents== | ||
# Need to work through the lists in the [[TD definition from Strategic Recommendations|technical directorate document]], identify which steps we'll do in our initial phase, and which will remain for future effort, and what is the default behavior absent a TD to act. | # Need to work through the lists in the [[TD definition from Strategic Recommendations|technical directorate document]], identify which steps we'll do in our initial phase, and which will remain for future effort, and what is the default behavior absent a TD to act. | ||
# Similar resolution of items in the Initial T3f Meeting document, including issues raised in the T3F Election correspondence | # Similar resolution of items in the Initial T3f Meeting document, including issues raised in the T3F Election correspondence | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 4 January 2007
Contents
Present
Dolin, Beeler, McCay, Parker, Case, Buitendyck
Agenda
- What do we believe the T3F deliverables to be?
- Discuss the material Hans sent us and develop action plans for creating the T3F deliverables.
- Additional logistics
Discussion
Deliverables and Scope
Recommend Structure & Architecture with White Papers and Dissolve
Execute part of the TD responsibilities as an interim
Deal with SI documents and Issues therein
Answer: All of the above
Focus
What should focus be? -- Identifying Architectural objectives and fulfilling them (i.e. reuse models not "DO THIS")
Identify issues between committees and recommend a process to resolve, but not to resolve by dictate.
Actions adopted
Steps
- Starting with the Current "HDF", and the SI Documents identify the SIX (not more) features/objectives of the HL7 "Architecture" (e.g. "reuse common models")
- Work through the SI documents to identify issues and strategies that prevent achieving these objectives, and/or facilitate achieving them
- Outline a standards development process that can realize deliverables that meet these objectives.
- Identify principles under which Committees are formed and differentiated, including inter-committee conflict and provide a resolution therefore.
- Create a white paper for review by Board and TSC about this
Reconcile Other Documents
- Need to work through the lists in the technical directorate document, identify which steps we'll do in our initial phase, and which will remain for future effort, and what is the default behavior absent a TD to act.
- Similar resolution of items in the Initial T3f Meeting document, including issues raised in the T3F Election correspondence
