Project Scope-Medical Product Information - SPLr5

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the Medical Product Information (SPLr5) project from RCRIM. Enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.

Link to document: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2FProjectScopeMedicalProduct-SPLr5.doc&revision=8380

• Summary - Passed (7/0/4/1)
  • Number of participants: 11
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 7
  • Comments: 1

• History: DESD: Project Scope: Medical Product Information (SPLr5)
  • 2/3/10 10:11:42 PM CET · Austin Kreisler · Poll added by "Austin Kreisler"
  • 2/4/10 11:16:11 AM CET · Alan Nicol (GAS) · Participant "Alan Nicol (GAS)" added OK: Abstain
  • 2/4/10 2:48:17 PM CET · Ed Tripp · Participant "Ed Tripp" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/4/10 3:10:51 PM CET · Joy Kuhl (Child Health) · Participant "Joy Kuhl (Child Health)" added OK: Abstain
  • 2/5/10 2:58:22 AM CET · Nancy Orvis (GP) · Participant "Nancy Orvis (GP)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/5/10 10:37:51 PM CET · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/9/10 3:45:10 PM CET · Helmut Koenig (II) · Participant "Helmut Koenig (II)" added OK: Abstain
  • 2/9/10 4:04:28 PM CET · Mead Walker (Patient Safety · Participant "Mead Walker (Patient Safety" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/9/10 5:59:41 PM CET · Garry Cruickshank (Pharmacy) · Participant "Garry Cruickshank (Pharmacy)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/9/10 11:56:20 PM CET · Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC) · Participant "Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/17/10 11:23:48 AM CET · William Goossen (PC) · Participant "William Goossen (PC)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 2/19/10 12:35:41 PM CET · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Participant "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added OK: Abstain
  • 2/19/10 12:48:22 PM CET · Melvin Reynolds · Comment by "Melvin Reynolds" added
  • 2/19/10 4:20:27 PM CET · Austin Kreisler · Poll closed by "Austin Kreisler"

• Comments:
  • Melvin Reynolds February 19, 2010 6:48:22 AM EST - Some detail concerns in DEV WG about the point-of-care value of this work, but the main motivation was understood. However, the poll demonstrated the concern of international companies that this work be properly socialised with GHTF, implicitly so that the burden of implementation is genuinely shareable across global regulatory regimes. See attached file for more detail of discussion and comments. If we could nuance this result it would be negative with conversion to support on explicit GHTF joining.