DESD PSS: CDA IG for Genetic Testing report-Project Extension CG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for the CG WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until 2/15/2012 unless quorum is reached earlier. Link to Document: PSS CDA IG for Genetic Testing Report
- Summary - Passed (9/0/0/2)
- Number of participants: 9
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 9
- Comments: 2
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0
| co-chairs | Affirmative | Negative | Abstain |
| Amnon Shabo (CG) | OK | ||
| John Roberts (PHER) | OK | ||
| Mead Walker(PSWG) | OK | ||
| Hugh GLover (Pharmacy) | OK | ||
| Joy Kuhl (Child Health) | OK | ||
| edward helton (RCRIM) | OK | ||
| Jim McClay (EC-WG) | OK | ||
| Jeffery Karp (AP) | OK | ||
| Anita Walden (CIC) | OK | ||
| Count | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Comments
| Name | Date | Time | Comment |
| Ed Tripp | Monday, January 30, 2012 | 7:00:31 AM GMT-12:00 | "email from Amnon Shabo:
Note that the attached document is based on the original PSS document, following guidance I got from Dave Hamill (see his message below) on this type of PSSs. The main difference is the extension of the project time line. Other edits are minor, mostly updates of names to reflect active members contributing to the project. Thanks, Amnon." |
| Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | Wednesday, February 8, 2012 | 5:25:31 AM GMT-12:00 | After reading the PSS, I understand that this is an update to an IG---is there a reason not to just update the current IG, rather than creating a new project? Also, in the scope it says 'as much as possible' which leaves the scope very open to never ending changes and no definitive end to the project...(the second comment is just an observation, no action required) |
