CIC Mission and Charter Update

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Clinical Interoperability Council work group. Enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.

Link to document: CIC Mission and Charter

• Summary - Passed (8/0/2/2)
  • Number of participants: 10
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 8
  • Comments: 2

• History: DESD: Mission and Charter: CIC
  • 4/5/10 4:40:59 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler · Poll added by "Austin Kreisler"
  • 4/6/10 9:48:55 AM CEST · Alan Nicol (GAS) · Participant "Alan Nicol (GAS)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/6/10 5:18:47 PM CEST · Ed Tripp (RCRIM) · Participant "Ed Tripp (RCRIM)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/7/10 7:26:24 PM CEST · Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC) · Participant "Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC)" added OK: Abstain
  • 4/12/10 10:26:55 AM CEST · Helmut König (II) · Participant "Helmut König (II)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/13/10 3:43:23 PM CEST · Mead Walker (Patient Safety) · Participant "Mead Walker (Patient Safety)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/13/10 4:42:25 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds · Participant "Melvin Reynolds" added OK: Abstain
  • 4/13/10 4:49:32 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Comment by "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added
  • 4/13/10 4:50:16 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds · Participant "Melvin Reynolds" deleted
  • 4/13/10 4:50:29 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Participant "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added OK: Abstain
  • 4/14/10 1:51:29 PM CEST · Steve Bentley (CIC) · Participant "Steve Bentley (CIC)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/16/10 10:19:06 PM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/16/10 10:24:55 PM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Comment by "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added
  • 4/20/10 7:55:31 PM CEST · Joy Kuhl (Child Health) · Participant "Joy Kuhl (Child Health)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/27/10 5:10:49 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler (DESD) · Participant "Austin Kreisler (DESD)" added OK: Affirmative
  • 4/27/10 10:50:59 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler · Poll closed by "Austin Kreisler"

• Comments
  • Rita Altamore (PHER) April 16, 2010 4:24:55 PM EDT PHER discussed the M&C at our 4/16 meeting. We voted to approve and to ask that PHER be explictly listed in the section "Formal Relationships with Other HL7 Groups".
  • Melvin Reynolds (DEV) April 13, 2010 10:49:32 AM EDT The principle and general scope is precisely what is needed. However,:
    • the text of paragraph 1 in the Charter is incomplete;
    • In "Formal Relationship with Groups Outside of HL7" the response of "None" is clearly not meaningful because some aspects of the "Work Products ..." are governed by regulatory considerations not covered in the external relationships "... Other HL7 Groups".
    • With suitable completion and consideration of the relationship issues the M&C will be heartily endorsed by DEV.

• Email thread:

Dear Austin,

Thanks for the clarification - resolution of issues accepted by Devices.

Best regards,

Melvin.

In mail of Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:09:40, "Kreisler, Austin J." wrote:

>DESD Co-chairs, >CIC has updated their Mission and Charter based on feedback provided >during the DESD vote. I believe they have addressed all of the items >noted below. > >Regarding Devices comment about formal relationships with groups >outside HL7, I just want to note that the external relationship section >should be reserved for those external relationships that have been >formalized by the HL7 Board and have been assigned to the work group to >manage.The Devices and Imaging are examples of such work groups. At >this time CIC has no responsibilities (as identified by the HL7 Board) >for managing relationships with any groups external to HL7. I will say >that many work groups are impacted by the regulatory environment in >which standards are used, but we do not document those as formal >relationships in the Mission and Charter, though they may be mentioned >elsewhere in the document. > >Thanks, Austin > >________________________________ > >From: Anita Walden >Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:48 AM >To: Kreisler, Austin J. >Cc: Edward Tripp; hannelore.kahles; meredith.nahm; >Steve.Bentley >Subject: Re: FW: DESD Votes in progress > >Hi Austin, > >Here is an updated version of the document with the following >modifications. > >Paragraph 1 - completed sentence. > >As for a formal agreement, we have accepted PHER's request and added >them to the Formal Agreement Section. > >In Response to the Formal Relationships outside of HL7, currently we do >not have a formal relationship with groups outside of HL7 but we may >have them in the future. > >Anita > >"Kreisler, Austin J." > >04/26/2010 10:38 AM > >To ><Steve.Bentley>, <hannelore.kahles, ><meredith.nahm>, <anita.walden> cc "Edward Tripp" ><edward.tripp> Subject >FW: DESD Votes in progress > >CIC Co-chairs, > >I haven't heard anything back from CIC regarding the comments below on >your Mission and Charter. Can one of you respond back to the domain >experts list with CIC's responses to these comments? > >For the CIC Mission and Charter we have the following comments: > >* PHER - PHER discussed the M&C at our 4/16 meeting. We >voted to >approve and to ask that PHER be explicitly listed in the section >"Formal Relationships with Other HL7 Groups". >* Devices - The principle and general scope is precisely >what is >needed. > However,: > 1 - the text of paragraph 1 in the Charter is >incomplete; > 2 - In "Formal Relationship with Groups Outside of HL7" >the >response of "None" is clearly not meaningful because some aspects of >the "Work Products ..." are governed by regulatory considerations not >covered in the external relationships "... Other HL7 Groups". > With suitable completion and consideration of the >relationship issues the M&C will be heartily endorsed by DEV. > >Thanks, Austin

-- Melvin I REYNOLDS,