BRIDG PSS R5

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the BR&R. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until February 6, 2017

Link to PSS Original PSS Updated PSS

Work Group Health: Green

• Summary -
  • Number of participants: 13
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 9
  • Comments: 5
  • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum

Vote and Comments

'	Affirmative	Negative (with comments)	Abstain
Laura Heermann Langford (EC)			OK
Craig Newman (PHER)			OK
Stephen Chu (PC)	OK
John Hatem (Pharm)			OK
John Walsh (Anesth)	OK
Ed Helton (BRIDG)	OK
David Pyke (CBCC)	OK
Bob Freimuth (CG)	OK
Russ Leftwich (LHS)	OK
John Kiser (RCRIM)	OK
Chris Millet (CQI)	OK
John Garguilo (HCD)			OK
Mitra Rocca (CIC)	OK
Count	9	0	4
Comments	Melva PetersHere is the link to the updated PSS based on the comments Updated PSS Laura Heermann Langord (ECWG) - ECWG would still like to see PSS's submitted for approval to be cleaned up without all of the template directions. The team is still not confident it fully understands the project so will abstain at this time. Laura Heermann Langord (ECWG) - Ditto to other comments John Hatem (Pharmacy) - Agree with previous comment on the details in this PSS. More detail would be nice to understand the work and goal. Craig Newman (PHER)The PSS is light on details, making it hard for anyone not familiar with the BRIDG model to understand what is being proposed. In particular, the Project Document Repository Location section contains 2 very generic URLs and one (http://www.bridgmodel.org/) that can't be reached.