Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
*Opportunities
 
*Opportunities
 
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
 
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
**Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost
 
 
**Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
 
**Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
 
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification
 
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification

Revision as of 16:59, 21 November 2016

  • Strengths
    • Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
    • Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
    • Support from HQ
    • Open, transparent, and responsive
    • Proactive
  • Weaknesses
    • Limited time
    • Limited control over resources
    • Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups
    • Lack of effective process for bringing in external proposed standards.
    • Lack of clear definition of the endorsement of external standards
    • Lack of linkage with HL7 Strategic Plan
    • Lack of coordination between T3SD WGs and HQ and other WGs
    • Change to intellectual property licensing has created inconsistent adherence to the intellectual property policy
    • Organizational complexity {new}
  • Opportunities
    • Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
    • Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
    • Clearly designate our product line and product identification
    • Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
    • Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
    • Improve product quality
    • Increase participation through simplification {new}
  • Threats
    • Creating overheads without visible return
    • Failure to improve Product Quality
    • Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards
    • Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm
    • Lack of clear relationship between user groups and work groups
    • Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
    • Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
    • Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards


Approved by TSC 2015-10-03