Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ' *Strengths ** Respected membership ** Committed membership ** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members ** Responsive *Weakness ** Limited time ** Limited control over res…') |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | *Strengths | ||
| + | **Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities | ||
| + | **Respected, committed, highly experienced membership | ||
| + | **Open, transparent, and responsive | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | * | + | *Weaknesses |
| − | ** Limited | + | **Limited influence over resources |
| − | ** | + | **Inconsistent interaction and support from Board and Working Groups |
| + | **Organizational complexity | ||
| + | **Insufficient time spent on big picture issues | ||
*Opportunities | *Opportunities | ||
| − | ** | + | **Become more proactive |
| − | ** | + | **Product quality |
| + | **Process Improvement | ||
| + | ***New tooling | ||
| + | **Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership | ||
| + | **Increase participation through simplification | ||
| + | **Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants | ||
| + | **Increased cooperation and collaboration with other industry groups | ||
*Threats | *Threats | ||
| − | ** | + | **Danger of creating overheads without visible return |
| − | + | **Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards | |
| − | ** | + | **Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR) |
| + | **Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created | ||
| + | **Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards | ||
| + | **Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan | ||
| + | **Succession planning | ||
| + | **Not enough international participation on TSC | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| − | Approved by TSC | + | Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval. |
Latest revision as of 16:21, 12 January 2019
- Strengths
- Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
- Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
- Open, transparent, and responsive
- Weaknesses
- Limited influence over resources
- Inconsistent interaction and support from Board and Working Groups
- Organizational complexity
- Insufficient time spent on big picture issues
- Opportunities
- Become more proactive
- Product quality
- Process Improvement
- New tooling
- Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
- Increase participation through simplification
- Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants
- Increased cooperation and collaboration with other industry groups
- Threats
- Danger of creating overheads without visible return
- Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards
- Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
- Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created
- Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
- Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan
- Succession planning
- Not enough international participation on TSC
Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval.
