Difference between revisions of "DESSD PSS: CQI Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the CQI WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until Ma...")
 
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
**Most popular option: Affirmative
 
**Most popular option: Affirmative
 
**Votes in favor: 9
 
**Votes in favor: 9
**Comments: 0
+
**Comments: 2
 
**Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:  
 
**Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:  
  

Latest revision as of 14:24, 11 June 2014

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the CQI WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until May 28, 2014.

Link to PSS http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2F2014%2FCQI_CDS_SDWG_%2520Health%2520Qualtiy%2520Information%2520Models%2520Harmonization%2520%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%252020140506%2520%2520clean.docx&sortby=date&sortdir=down&view=log

Work Group Health: Green Review of PBS Metrics: GREEN

Link to Doodle Poll: Doodle Poll Link

  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 9
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 9
    • Comments: 2
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:
' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
CQI OK
Edward Helton RCRIM OK
John Rhoads (HCD/DEV) OK
Melva Peters (Pharmacy) OK
James Mcclay (ECWG) OK
Russ Leftwich (Patient Care) OK
John Walsh (Anesthesia) OK
Mike Padula (Child Health) OK
Dianne Reeves (CIC) OK
Count 9 0 0
Comments '
CIC Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:06:39 o'clock AM GMT+00:00 This PSS references SAIF as the basis for the activity in several places in the document. At the Phoenix meeting at the cochairs dinner we heard that SAIF is essentially being retired for several reasons. Is it appropriate to continue to cite SAIF as a basis of this project, or something else? CIC does not require a change in the document but would like to know the thoughts of CQI on this item.
Patient Care Friday, May 9, 2014 3:30:37 o'clock PM GMT+00:00 Please list Patient Care as an interested party to this project. Also, please explain "syntactic sugar".