Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: Clinical Statement from Pharmacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open unti…') |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:01, 6 December 2011
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until 12/12/2011 unless quorum is reached earlier. Link to Document: Statement PSS-Pharmacy
- Summary - Passed (8/0/0/1)
- Number of participants: 8
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 8
- Comments: 1
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0
| Co-Chair (WG) | Affirmative | Negative | Abstain |
| Jim McKinley (AWG) | OK | ||
| Mead Walker (PSWG) | OK | ||
| Melva Peters (Pharmacy WG) | OK | ||
| Helmut Koenig (II) | OK | ||
| John Roberts (PHER) | OK | ||
| John Rhoads (DEV) | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| edwardhelton(RCRIM) | OK | ||
| Count | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Comments
| Name | Time | Comment |
| Mead Walker | Monday, November 21, 2011, 3:05:22 AM GMT-12:00 | I think it is important to maintain use of the Common Product Model for information on medicinal products while working to align pharmacy and clinical statement. |
