CIC PSS - Common Clinical Registry Framework - Core Data Elements

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

NOTE: UPDATED PSS:

Please vote on the PSS for the CIC WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until March 1, 2018.

Link to PSS: Link to Updated PSS

PBS Metrics: Green

• Summary -
  • Number of participants: 9
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 9
  • Comments: 3
  • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum

Vote and Comments

'	Affirmative	Negative (with comments)	Abstain
Jim McClay (EC)			OK
Scott Robertson (Pharm)	OK
Russ Leftwich (LHS)	OK
Floyd Eisenberg (CQI)	OK
Hugh Glover (BRIDG)	OK
Kevin Power (Clinical Genomics)	OK
Jim Kretz (CBCP)	OK
Joginder Madra (PH)	OK
Craig Gabron (AWG)	OK
Count	9	0	0
Comments: Scott Robertson (Pharm):The Project Need refers to “…encountered barriers due to variation in data formats and data models.” But the PSS answers N/A to the question about current data types. The purpose implies that data format is in scope, then the project should consider the HL7 data types. Floyd Eisenberg (CQI): Also, please add your project number to all PSS's to avoid confusion and to avoid duplication of review efforts. Floyd Eisenberg (CQI): Suggest you fix the date for CQI WG approval as a co-sponsor - it occurred at the WGM on January 30, 2018 as per our WGM minutes. (Also, in the co-sponsoring WGs, fix HER to EHR).