BR&R PSS: BRIDG update

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 13:22, 13 March 2018 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the BR&R WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the BR&R WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until March 10, 2018.

Link to PSS: Link to PSS

PBS Metrics: Green

  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 12
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 10
    • Comments: 1
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum

Vote and Comments

' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
Scott Robertson (Pharm) OK
Russ Leftwich (LHS) X
Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) OK
Ed Helton (BRIDG) OK
Kevin Power (Clinical Genomics) OK
Joginder Madra (PH) OK
Craig Garbron (AWG) OK
John Walsh (Anesth) X
Jim McClay (EC) X
David Pyke (CBCP) OK
Mitra Rocca (CIC) OK
Emma Jones (PC) OK
Count 10 2 1
Comments:
  • Jim McClay (ECWG)- I voted negative as the underlying materials weren't shared. The structured pathology report is a CDA I assume. structured documents isn't a co-sponsor. Also who is harmonizing the FDA information model with the V3 RIM?