Difference between revisions of "2011-05-18 TSC WGM Architecture Program Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 153: Line 153:
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
  
'''Review WGM agenda (any project updates that can be added?)'''
+
*Program Listserv: saif_arch_pgm@lists.hl7.org
*Dave requested that the CMET Management work be included in Austin’s presentations
 
*Main focus will be governance
 
  
'''SAIF and Sound White Paper Document - Review Feedback from the team's review of the document'''
 
*Regarding Jane’s comment on postponing the publication of it.
 
*Rick agreed that it’s a good idea to put it on Hold.
 
*Jane:  Governance discussions may impact the White Paper as well.
 
  
'''Review project list to see if some should be brought in under the SAIF AP umbrella (#1855) '''
+
'''Review the charter'''<br/>
*What criteria do we want to use to determine in/out of scope of SAIF AP.
+
*CMead suggested that the Charter may want to be modified to include that one of the core deliverables should be that both of the architectures will emerge.
*Austin felt the governance discussion would impact how we define what should/should not be included
+
*Mission was modified: 18 Approve; 0 Negative; 0 Abstain
*JaneOne governance criteria should be does the Work Group’s products influence the products of other Work Groups (examples, CDA, CMETs, etc)
+
 
*Review FTSD projects first; SSD SD are the two biggest SDs to review
+
'''Next Conf Call'''<br/>
*Go ForwardSpend 10-15 minutes as a group to go through the projects
+
*5/25 – No Call
 +
*6/1 – Rick Haddorff  chairs
 +
*6/8 -  Rick Haddorff chairs
 +
 
 +
'''Next WGM'''<br/>
 +
*MnM is scheduling a quarter to focus on their SAIF AP work
 +
*The team agreed only one quarter in Sept 2011
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Pilot Coordination Project Update'''<br/>
 +
*Need to add Wrappers R2
 +
*Coordination Item: Will be determined after the PSS is approved.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Security Cookbook Update (Jane Curry)'''<br/>
 +
*Security attended an architecture definition meeting.
 +
*The discussion focused on ‘Where should the security work show up in other’s artifacts?’
 +
*Coordination Item:  Security and the SAIF IG project (architecture definition) (Jane is working with them at the enterprise level)
 +
 
 +
'''OO (Austin on behalf of Patrick Loyd)'''<br/>
 +
*Promised to write the Project Scope Statements this week.
 +
*They’ve got tooling in place and modelers lined up
 +
 
 +
'''CDA R3 Project (Kreisler)'''<br/>
 +
*This Friday, will be determining the current milestones and wrap up the requirements
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''SAIF Conanical Book (Mead)'''<br/>
 +
*Completed the Informative Ballot;
 +
*Have addressed all the negatives
 +
*Current plan is the ArB will take the current Informative document and determine how to make it into a SAIF IG.
 +
*Will release SAIF Cononical Version 1.
 +
*Then will Include Performance Statements and ballot a DSTU of the Canonical.
 +
*This will be called SAIF Cononical Version 2
 +
 
 +
'''SAIF IG (McKenzie)'''<br/>
 +
*Creating the list of artifacts.
 +
*Template has been vetted numerous times
 +
*Still need to find about 10 artifacts
 +
*Need to assign names to the artifacts
 +
*Wanted to have all the artifacts defined by this meeting; did not happen.
 +
*New target is a couple of months from now.
 +
*Begin thinking about Governance prior to September 2011.
 +
*CMeadDefining the artifacts is the high priority; Where they go is lower priority
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Quality Plan Project (Kreisler)'''<br/>
 +
*The plan is to bake quality into the processes, and will be the primary driver of quality products.
 +
*Intimately linked with governance
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Governance (Curry)'''<br/>
 +
*Jane presented her Governance Framework presentation
 +
*LloydDo we have ways to manage/insure accountability/responsibility for governance within HL7?
 +
 
 +
*Not every artifact will have a set of precepts.
 +
*The plan is to begin with a small set of precepts and build from there.
 +
*Get one or two up and running to test them out to see if they work.
 +
*CMead suggests the first ones be on the riskier ones
 +
 
  
'''Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)'''
 
*No progress since last week regarding the schedule.
 
*New Item added was: information model consistency
 
*"From an Ioana email regarding modeling of citizenship in CDA R3, but per Austin, the broader issue is how SAIF Governance will handle ""information model consistency"
 
*Rick asked about actual documenting…how much is owned by the SAIF Pilot Coordination and how much is owned by the individual projects.
 
*Which projects are dependent upon other project’s deliverables
 
  
  
'''EA Action Item Update'''
 
*Jane presented her document of Managing the Sparx EA Software Keys Distribution
 
*Robert asked if HL7 must use EA.  Jane said no, some HL7ers use the Rational product.
 
*Robert asked if there was any type of checklist or feature list to assist a user on determining which product would be best for their needs.
 
*Austin indicated that the best place for this discussion is within the Tooling WG calls.
 
  
 
Gforge Accounts can be requested via:  
 
Gforge Accounts can be requested via:  
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd
  
''Adjourned 11:02 AM Eastern Time
+
''Adjourned 5:02 AM Eastern Time

Revision as of 13:43, 19 May 2011

Agenda

  1. Review the charter
  2. Review status of Projects
    1. Pilot Coordination Project’s work on the SAIF BF WG spreadsheet
    2. Project Services meets Mon Q3 at the May WGM
  3. Begin discussion of governance, and what it should look like
    1. SAIF and Sound White paper part of governance?
    2. Quality Plan - Tracker 1913 (Write a one or two pager about what the Quality Plan is going to be)
  4. Integrating security into the SAIF AP. Does the team want to govern Security? (from John Moehrke's Security Cookbook presenation on April 20, 2011)
  5. Housekeeping
    1. May 25th call -- keep or cancel?
    2. Next WGM Needs
    3. Upcoming vacation schedules/impacts to upcoming calls

Meeting Attendees

X=Present on Call

Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) David Hamill
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Austin Kreisler TSC Chair
X Brian Pech Interested Participant
X David Hamill HL7 HQ / Program Manager
Ed Tripp Domain Experts SD \ TSC
X Gregg Seppala Product Quality Plan Project
X Jane Curry Tooling
Jim McClay Emergency Care
John Moehrke Security Cookbook
John Quinn HL7 CTO
X Lloyd McKenzie MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
Lorraine Constable Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
Patrick Loyd OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X Rick Haddorff Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
Robert Lario Object Management
Steve Hufnagel ArB / SAIF Book Project / SOA
Wendy Huang Implementation Conformance WG
X Gary Dickinson EHR WG
X Pat Van Dyke EHR WG
X Woody Beeler MnM WG
X Charlie Mead ArB WG
X Lee Coller
X Kent Stevenson
X Thomas Kuhn
X Freida Hall
X Andy Bond
X Larry Reis
X Dale Nelson
X Anil Luthra
X Isabelle Davies
X Ron Parker
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  • Program Listserv: saif_arch_pgm@lists.hl7.org


Review the charter

  • CMead suggested that the Charter may want to be modified to include that one of the core deliverables should be that both of the architectures will emerge.
  • Mission was modified: 18 Approve; 0 Negative; 0 Abstain

Next Conf Call

  • 5/25 – No Call
  • 6/1 – Rick Haddorff chairs
  • 6/8 - Rick Haddorff chairs

Next WGM

  • MnM is scheduling a quarter to focus on their SAIF AP work
  • The team agreed only one quarter in Sept 2011


Pilot Coordination Project Update

  • Need to add Wrappers R2
  • Coordination Item: Will be determined after the PSS is approved.


Security Cookbook Update (Jane Curry)

  • Security attended an architecture definition meeting.
  • The discussion focused on ‘Where should the security work show up in other’s artifacts?’
  • Coordination Item: Security and the SAIF IG project (architecture definition) (Jane is working with them at the enterprise level)

OO (Austin on behalf of Patrick Loyd)

  • Promised to write the Project Scope Statements this week.
  • They’ve got tooling in place and modelers lined up

CDA R3 Project (Kreisler)

  • This Friday, will be determining the current milestones and wrap up the requirements


SAIF Conanical Book (Mead)

  • Completed the Informative Ballot;
  • Have addressed all the negatives
  • Current plan is the ArB will take the current Informative document and determine how to make it into a SAIF IG.
  • Will release SAIF Cononical Version 1.
  • Then will Include Performance Statements and ballot a DSTU of the Canonical.
  • This will be called SAIF Cononical Version 2

SAIF IG (McKenzie)

  • Creating the list of artifacts.
  • Template has been vetted numerous times
  • Still need to find about 10 artifacts
  • Need to assign names to the artifacts
  • Wanted to have all the artifacts defined by this meeting; did not happen.
  • New target is a couple of months from now.
  • Begin thinking about Governance prior to September 2011.
  • CMead: Defining the artifacts is the high priority; Where they go is lower priority


Quality Plan Project (Kreisler)

  • The plan is to bake quality into the processes, and will be the primary driver of quality products.
  • Intimately linked with governance


Governance (Curry)

  • Jane presented her Governance Framework presentation
  • Lloyd: Do we have ways to manage/insure accountability/responsibility for governance within HL7?
  • Not every artifact will have a set of precepts.
  • The plan is to begin with a small set of precepts and build from there.
  • Get one or two up and running to test them out to see if they work.
  • CMead suggests the first ones be on the riskier ones



Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd

Adjourned 5:02 AM Eastern Time