Difference between revisions of "2010-01-19 TSC WGM Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*(10 mins)Innovations Workshop recap | *(10 mins)Innovations Workshop recap | ||
*#Lessons learned from Monday workshop | *#Lessons learned from Monday workshop | ||
| + | *#*Need a clear brand for innovations activity to distinguish innovation work from mainstream development | ||
| + | *#*:e.g. Eclipse incubator projects | ||
| + | *#*Mohawk MARC HI | ||
*#Top few innovation suggestions | *#Top few innovation suggestions | ||
*#Plans between now and end of May WGM | *#Plans between now and end of May WGM | ||
*#Review the decision that this should be an activity that reports to the TSC | *#Review the decision that this should be an activity that reports to the TSC | ||
*#Recommendations to the board | *#Recommendations to the board | ||
| − | *( | + | *#* |
| + | *#* | ||
| + | *#Next Steps | ||
| + | *#*Innovation branding for DCM project | ||
| + | *#*Directed Innovation: identify TSC-proposed innovation challenges | ||
| + | *#* | ||
| + | *(10 minutes)[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5418/6828/HL7EA-IPNextStepsDiscussionPaper2010Jan.doc EA IP Next Steps Discussion Paper], | ||
| + | **Reference link [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5413/6821/SAEAF-SnapShot-May2009.doc Overview Snapshot May2009] | ||
| + | **Reference link | ||
*(20 minutes)Suggestions as to how we can do an effective evaluation of the TSC as prescribed by the T3F. | *(20 minutes)Suggestions as to how we can do an effective evaluation of the TSC as prescribed by the T3F. | ||
| − | *( | + | *(10 minutes)Next steps for establishing a Product Strategy Group that reports to the Board, Marketing, and the TSC, and is charged with ensuring that HL7 has a Product Strategy. |
** complementing the work that Stan is doing on V2/V3 direction, and vital to the success of the organisation | ** complementing the work that Stan is doing on V2/V3 direction, and vital to the success of the organisation | ||
**suggestion: initial group of 3-6 people who would start work on a straw man, and (just as important) a charter for the group describing its scope, ways of working, and relations to other groups in HL7 | **suggestion: initial group of 3-6 people who would start work on a straw man, and (just as important) a charter for the group describing its scope, ways of working, and relations to other groups in HL7 | ||
**For discussion at Marketing Monday q2, Tuesday lunch TSC meeting, and then John to propose it to the board as part of the CTO report | **For discussion at Marketing Monday q2, Tuesday lunch TSC meeting, and then John to propose it to the board as part of the CTO report | ||
*(10 mins) DCM discussion recap with Patient Care Tuesday Q1 | *(10 mins) DCM discussion recap with Patient Care Tuesday Q1 | ||
| − | *( | + | *(5 mins) Feedback to TSC from International Affiliate meeting – |
| + | **Expressing International endorsement for projects through interest in the ballot pool, like one would 'Follow' a discussion on Twitter/Linked In, tied to membership? | ||
*Move forward to another discussion? SMART objective review, for Roadmap Strategic Initiatives | *Move forward to another discussion? SMART objective review, for Roadmap Strategic Initiatives | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 19 January 2010
Tuesday January 19 2010 (Phoenix) TSC Luncheon
Agenda
- (10 mins)Innovations Workshop recap
- Lessons learned from Monday workshop
- Need a clear brand for innovations activity to distinguish innovation work from mainstream development
- e.g. Eclipse incubator projects
- Mohawk MARC HI
- Need a clear brand for innovations activity to distinguish innovation work from mainstream development
- Top few innovation suggestions
- Plans between now and end of May WGM
- Review the decision that this should be an activity that reports to the TSC
- Recommendations to the board
- Next Steps
- Innovation branding for DCM project
- Directed Innovation: identify TSC-proposed innovation challenges
- Lessons learned from Monday workshop
- (10 minutes)EA IP Next Steps Discussion Paper,
- Reference link Overview Snapshot May2009
- Reference link
- (20 minutes)Suggestions as to how we can do an effective evaluation of the TSC as prescribed by the T3F.
- (10 minutes)Next steps for establishing a Product Strategy Group that reports to the Board, Marketing, and the TSC, and is charged with ensuring that HL7 has a Product Strategy.
- complementing the work that Stan is doing on V2/V3 direction, and vital to the success of the organisation
- suggestion: initial group of 3-6 people who would start work on a straw man, and (just as important) a charter for the group describing its scope, ways of working, and relations to other groups in HL7
- For discussion at Marketing Monday q2, Tuesday lunch TSC meeting, and then John to propose it to the board as part of the CTO report
- (10 mins) DCM discussion recap with Patient Care Tuesday Q1
- (5 mins) Feedback to TSC from International Affiliate meeting –
- Expressing International endorsement for projects through interest in the ballot pool, like one would 'Follow' a discussion on Twitter/Linked In, tied to membership?
- Move forward to another discussion? SMART objective review, for Roadmap Strategic Initiatives
