SSDMeeting2008 08 19

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SSD Steering Group

Minutes of Aug 18, 2008

NameOrganizationE-MailGroup
Calvin BeebeMayo Cliniccbeebe@mayo.eduSD
Gregg SeppalaVHAGregg.seppala@va.govPA
Matt SailorsThe Methodist HospitalMSailors@tmhs.orgCDS, Arden
John RitterIntel Corporation, Digital Health Groupjohn.ritter@intel.comEHR
Hans BuitendijkSiemens Healthcarehans.buitendijk@siemens.comOO
Patrick LoydGordon Point Informatics Ltd.patrick.loyd@gpinformatics.com OO


Three EHR Publication motions:

Motion: The Structure and Semantic Design Steering Division approves the development -- and recommends the release -- of the EHR Work Group's "Personal Health Record System Functional Model" as a Draft Standard for Trial Use based on its successful ballot reconciliation.

Made by: EHR (John) Seconded by: OO (Hans)

Approve: 6 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 -- Motion Passed


Motion: The Structure and Semantic Design Steering Division approves the development -- and recommends the release -- of the EHR Work Group's "EHR Lifecycle Model" as a Draft Standard for Trial Use based on its successful ballot reconciliation.

Made by: EHR (John) Seconded by: OO (Hans)

Approve: 6 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 -- Motion Passed


Motion: The Structure and Semantic Design Steering Division approves the development -- and recommends the release -- of the EHR Work Group's "HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Reference Profile for EHR Interoperability" as a Draft Standard for Trial Use based on its successful ballot reconciliation.

Made by: EHR (John) Seconded by: OO (Hans)

Approve: 6 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 -- Motion Passed


Note:Request to let Don Lloyd know that he can proceed with publication once TSC approves.


Formation of Clinical Statement WG:

Request to have the Clinical Statement project turn into a formal Workgroup, given that this has proven to be a sustained effort.

Hans reviewed the clinical statement project request to become a formal work group; the group has decided that this is along term activity that will take time to manage. How to move forward, should it be a project or a Work Group. The time allocation needs to be coordinated between the various other committees that participate at the workgroup. Working on the last 3 to 4 years, but will be on going. Last working group meeting the vote was to turn into working group.

Friendly amendment: Add actual names to the form to be submitted. Accepted by Hans.

Motion: Accept change of the clinical statement project to Clinical Statement work group.

Made by: OO (Hans) Seconded by: EHR (John)

Approve: 6 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 -- Motion Passed