BR&R PSS: CDISC Lab Model to FHIR

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 14:44, 3 August 2018 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the BR&R WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until A...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the BR&R WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until August 2, 2018.

Link to PSS: Link to PSS

PBS Metrics: Green

Link to Doodle Poll: Doodle Poll

  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 11
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 10
    • Comments: 3
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum
    • NOTE: BR&R VOTED TWICE SO ONLY ONE VOTE WAS COUNTED

Vote and Comments

' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
Emma Jones (PC) x
Craig Newman (PH) x
Patty Craig (CQI) x
Kevin Power (Clinical Genomics) x
Jim McClay (EC) x
Melva Peters (Pharmacy) x
Hugh Glover (BR&R) x
John Walsh (Anesth) x
Myron Finseth (BR&R) x
John Garguilo (HCD) x
Laura Heerman Langford (CIC) x
Count 11 0 0
COMMENTS:
  • Patty Craig: Given that this will most likely identify data gaps within FHIR, we suggest that you engage with CIMI to ensure the data models stay in synch. Also please list CQI as an interested party as measure developers may also be interested in using the identified data.
  • Craig Newman (PH)- If this project is slated to be balloted in Sept 2018, it seems like section 3.K should be able to indicate whether or not external vocab will be used. Section 5.b should also be populated
  • David Pyke (CBCP) - CBCP would like to be an interested party to be able to understand the consent needs for research participation and data exchange. This will assist us in the Research Consent use case for the Consent resource