Pharmacy PSS - MedicationKnowledge and Medication Logical Model
Revision as of 16:51, 26 April 2018 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open u...")
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until April 25, 2018.
Link to PSS: Pharmacy PSS
PBS Metrics: Green
- Summary -
- Number of participants: 11
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 10
- Comments: 2
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum
Vote and Comments
' | Affirmative | Negative (with comments) | Abstain |
Stephen Chu (PC) | OK | ||
John Hatem (Pharm) | OK | ||
John Walsh (Anesth) | OK | ||
Russ Leftwich (LHS) | OK | ||
Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) | OK | ||
Myron Finseth (BR&R) | OK | ||
Kevin Power (Clinical Genomics) | OK | ||
David Pyke (CBCP) | OK | ||
Joginder Madra (PH) | OK | ||
Christol Green (AWG) | OK | ||
Ed Helton (BR&R) | OK | ||
Count | 11 | 0 | 2 |
NOTE: BR&R submitted 2 votes - but was only counted once in the final vote count - 10/0/0 | |||
Comments: PCWG comment - Medication knowledge/information is important to patient care decisions. It is useful/preferable that PCWG is included as interested party. - Stephen Chu. | |||
Comment: Patient Care is already listed as an interested party in the PSS - Melva Peters |