Pharmacy PSS - MedicationKnowledge and Medication Logical Model

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 16:51, 26 April 2018 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open u...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until April 25, 2018.

Link to PSS: Pharmacy PSS

PBS Metrics: Green

  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 11
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 10
    • Comments: 2
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum

Vote and Comments

' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
Stephen Chu (PC) OK
John Hatem (Pharm) OK
John Walsh (Anesth) OK
Russ Leftwich (LHS) OK
Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) OK
Myron Finseth (BR&R) OK
Kevin Power (Clinical Genomics) OK
David Pyke (CBCP) OK
Joginder Madra (PH) OK
Christol Green (AWG) OK
Ed Helton (BR&R) OK
Count 11 0 2
NOTE: BR&R submitted 2 votes - but was only counted once in the final vote count - 10/0/0
Comments: PCWG comment - Medication knowledge/information is important to patient care decisions. It is useful/preferable that PCWG is included as interested party. - Stephen Chu.
Comment: Patient Care is already listed as an interested party in the PSS - Melva Peters