TSC SWOT
Revision as of 13:43, 3 October 2015 by Anne wizauer (talk | contribs)
- Strengths
- Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
- Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
- Support from HQ
- Open, transparent, and responsive
- Proactive
- Weakness
- Limited time
- Limited control over resources
- Support from Board and Working Groups
- Process for bringing in external proposed standards.
- Linkage with Strategic Initiatives
- Opportunities
- Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
- Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost
- Increased uptake by national programs
- Clearly designate our product line and product identification
- Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
- Leverage new membership benefits for IP management, help desk, user groups, and conformance testing, in dealing with technical issues.
- Provide mechanisms to allow vitality assessment throughout the organization; define criteria for trigger events: including ability to define processes for assessment, provide strategic and tactical guidance to the EC and Board.
- Threats
- Creating overheads without visible return
- Improve Product Quality
- Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards
- Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm
- Lack of clear governance surrounding new member benefits e.g. user groups, help desk
- Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
- Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
Approved by TSC 2014-09-13