2014-07-02 TRAC
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2014-06-18 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): |
Quorum | n/a | ||||
Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
Pat Van Dyke | Rick Haddorff | Melva Peters | |||
John Quinn | regrets | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | ||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2014-06-11 TRAC
- Action Items:
- Update on Generic WGM Checklist Calendar - Rick
- Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
- Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
- Determine tracking metric on three pronged measure for minutes, meeting room requests (app still in beta) and agenda posting - review last cycle's data when Rick and Melva are on the call.
- Pat will circulate bullet points on WG Balloting combined metric prior to the meeting for review.
- Review late project submissions with Dave
- Review the use and definition of the columns in the governance points focusing on the ISM from 6/11 risk spreadsheet
- precepts for the IP protection issues and address the related risks.
- Risk identification from recent XSLT vulnerability issue
- This group might identify the risks and suggest mitigations such as product family- or artifact-specific rules for versioning.
- Add to spreadsheet tracker the risk mitigations identified:
- TSC addition of ISM to publication request should be added to a mitigation strategy for an existing risk or create a strategic risk to represent what it is meant to mitigate.
- US Realm Task Force as mitigation to risk where US Realm does not have authority of an affiliate.
- TSC referred action:
- WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc using Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Would measurements from before and after the changed process to disallow a single check box to enroll in all of the ballots be meaningful? Discussion deferred from TSC agenda 6/9.
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved