DESD PSS: Clinical Genomics DIM

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for Clinical Genomics. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until November 11th.

Link to updated Project scope statement Clinical Genomics DIM PSS

Summary - Passed (7/0/1/1)

• Number of participants: 9
• Most popular option: Affirmative
• Votes in favour: 6
• Comments: 2
• Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0

Review of PBS Metrics and Work Group Health

• Melva sent email to Clinical Genomics Co-Chairs to clean up outstanding milestones on projects before next WGM

Vote

'	Affirmative	Negative (with Comments)	Abstain
Amnon Shabo (CG)	OK
Craig Gabron (AWG)			OK
Ken Pool (PHER)	OK
edward helton RCRIM			OK
Laura Langford (PCWG)	OK
Jim MCClay (ECWG)			OK
Dianne Reeves (CIC)	OK
Patty Craig (CQI)	OK
Melva Peters (Pharmacy)	OK
Count	6	0	3

Comments

Submitter	Comment
Patty Craig (CQI) - Friday, November 1, 2013 8:41:56 o'clock AM GMT-12:00	CQI believes it is probably still a long way off before quality measures attempted to use genomics data (most likely as exclusions), but since it will most likely occur at somepoint in the future, we would like to be listed as an interested party. THANKS!
Jim McClay (ECWG)Monday, October 21, 2013 11:47:29 o'clock PM GMT-12:00	While we support the PSS, we believe patient level phenotypic data is collected by the EHR and genomics data will need to be integrated into medical decision making. The EHR WG will need to extend the EHR FM to include genomics data and the PC WG will need to provide the information models for integration of genomics and phenotype data. Therefore. we (ECWG) recommend the Genomics WG include the EHR WG and PC WG as an interested party.