2013-06-18 ANSI/GOM Task Force notes

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 14:17, 18 June 2013 by Llaakso (talk | contribs) (Created page with '__NOTOC__ ==TSC Agenda/Minutes == ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== Category:2013 TSC Minutes {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | width="0%" colspan="2" align="le…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

HL7 TSC ANSI/GOM Task Force Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 273-848-837

Date: 2013-05-28
Time: 6:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Austin Kreisler Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Quorum n/a
Attendees
Calvin Beebe
Jean Duteau
Freida Hall
regrets Austin Kreisler
Lynn Laakso (scribe)
Pat Van Dyke

Agenda

Link to updated GOM
Action Items:

  • Update from the GOC call June 13, to discuss the balance check timing
  • Jean will write something on How do we flag balance issues on the ballot tally page among voter categories? 'No single interest category can constitute a majority.' Don would need to create % summaries of the interest types and the mechanism to "lock down" enrollment at any point after the enrollment closes where it comes into balance
  • Resolve “backup” dilemma encountered when CTO is not available. - Austin will talk with John on his preferences for the backup position.
  • Freida will to write up the normative ballot pools being open as a GOM change. As a side effect, we will remove the checkbox to enroll in all pools at once.
  • Freida will send a suggestion on the interpretation policy that was discussed by Ed and Karen

Status:

  • We’ll need to submit proposed changes to the GOM by end of June, other than ANSI audit issues which are already approved work items.

Review of the continued list of Partial List of Needed or Suggested Changes still has areas that have not been addressed. Final set of comments from the ANSI auditor now available

  • the ANSI auditor has provided response on an item we've discussed (excerpt of email from Karen to GOC):
    1. The way we define consensus body and how we determine balance.
    They are requesting that we change our procedures to do a balance check before the ballot begins (we currently check this one week or so into the ballot) and that balance we applied to the consensus group, not the ballot group. This can be done a couple of different ways, so we will need some discussion here. Also we need to clarify how abstentions are treated and whether or not an abstention is considered a vote.


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:



Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.