2013-02-28 TRAC

TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes

back to TRAC page

Meeting Info/Attendees

TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# GoToMeeting ID: 660-939-197		Date: 2013-02-28 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke		Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso

Quorum ??				yes/no
Chair/CTO		Members		Members
x	Pat Van Dyke	.	Charlie Mead		Melva Peters
.	John Quinn	x	Austin Kreisler	.

Agenda

• Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
• Overview of work to date -
  • What areas where review has been submitted and completed
    • Set review schedule for known sources of risk
    • Plan for review of GOM on regular basis
    • Describe feedback loop
• Areas submitted where review still needs to occur
  • Check with Jane on GOM Section 16 Risks
  • T3F Strategic Initiative TSC Self Assessment results
• Confirmation of meeting time - meet Feb 28th, March 7, break, and resume April 4th
• Continue risk assessment review (GOM)
  • Columns F and I are consistent and risks are typed correctly
  • Review GOM sections 5, 10, 13, 14, 15 with group
  • Plan for review of impact: critical and likelihood: High
• How to address "issues"

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

• Look at the updated risk assessment; determine what the triggers are for ongoing review.
• Scheduling - Pat out for three weeks after next Thursday.
• Austin suggests we may need to reach out to non-TSC people for the group. Charlie has been unable to facilitate developing governance points as he's lost participation funding. Melva is in Singapore on a 12-hour time difference. Charlie's backup might be Jane but she has also been withdrawing her HL7 participation.
  • Who would our outreach group be? Perhaps we need methodology representation - someone from MnM? Need someone from project services, perhaps Rick Haddorff. Names floated included Hans, Jim Case. Sequestration and furlough plans by the Feds discussed. Brian may be another.
• JeanH starting the ANSI/GOM processes review.
• Austin notes that this group needs to take the risk assessment and turn it into governance points. Outstanding review on Jane's section; if she can't finish GOM Section 16.
• How to address "issues"? TSC needs to address issues for active management, though the risk must still be tracked. After initial risk triage and creation of governance points, the risk assessment activity becomes a management function. The TRAC continues to consider governance points. The development of mechanisms to handle governance vs management work with the TSC. It was thought that the Architecture Program would take on the management aspects.
• T3F Strategic Initiative TSC Self Assessment results - review red and yellow against existing risk items; if there isn't one then develop new risk items. This would make a good introductory task for someone coming in from outreach. Original survey is at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7262/10203/Survey_30497710.pdf.

Adjourned at 9:57 AM

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) .

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items 2013-03-07 TRAC.

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.