Attendees

Beeler, Blobel, Lorenzi, McCay, Parker, Quinn. Unavailable: Case, Buitendijk,

Roll Call & Accept agenda

Next weeks call shift to Wednesday, January 24 at noon Eastern, then go to regular schedule

Goal date: May WGM - have a proposal that can be discussed and refined at WGM

Establish whether TD/T3F will: oversee development, or approve/monitor/intervene projects
Assume: Reasonable staffing/commitment levels for TD at
- 2-hrs per week is realistic (1 call, 1 work) (Note: SI plan says 3-4 hrs/wk)
- 5-7 hours during a WGM

Goal date(s): First report in 30 days, then continue

Verify that Governance & Structure is not in conflict with us
Continue our collaboration with Project Life Cycle
- Add Action item to be sure Life Cycle is implementable in organization

==Maintain clear open communication to membership== (ongoing)

NOTE: Do NOT edit these minutes the same list appears as Core Challenges For T3F where it can be revised, amended and appended.

Formally - Accepted Items 2 thru 6 on the list, thereby completing item 1

Charlie McCay accepted action to to assemble list of documents for consideration under item 3.1 of action item list.

We discussed Six Core Architecture Features. The discussion rambled but there seemed to be consensus on three key points:

As listed, the features are "ok" for a techie elevator talk
The features need to be extended to include an over-arching schema and references or bindings to existing technical architectures (e.g. Zachmann) See e-mail from Blobel
This list must open with its relationship to HL7's product strategy and mission -- paraphrased as "to do whats needed for interoperability" (E-mail from Lorenzi will be used to update the six-features page)

Dropped for lack of time, but was added to Core challenges